May 22, 2012

Congress Passes Legislation Requiring Oil, Gas and Mining Companies to Report Payments to Government

The U.S. Congress passed legislation that required oil, gas, mining, and other extractive industry companies to report to the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) their payments to governments. The legislation was added as an amendment to the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was sponsored by Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) and Representative Barney Frank (D-MA), and voted into law on July 15, 2010.

The premise of the bill is that transparency, in the long run, supports human rights, and helps limit corruption in countries where few benefits from mineral wealth typically reach the general population. The bill requires all companies that are securities issuers under U.S. law to report to the SEC on their payments in an annual report. The legislation covers most, but not all, major multinational companies, but does not encompass a number of state-owned companies that are primarily active in their own jurisdictions and have no presence in the U.S., and thus are not issuers.

The legislation requires companies to report on the type and total amount of payments made on a project basis to both the U.S. and foreign governments. The payments that companies must report include taxes, royalties, fees, production entitlements, bonuses, and other material benefits. Payments do not include de minimis payments.

The legislation is intended to reinforce the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which is a multi-stakeholder initiative consisting of oil, gas, and mining companies; civil society; and governments. Under the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, many U.S. companies already report their payments to some, although not all, governments around the world.

Although the legislation is intended to support the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, it requires reporting by project, in contrast with the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which typically is less rigorous, calling for reporting either in the aggregate by country or by type of revenue.

The SEC’s rulemaking process will help define more clearly how companies will need to change their accounting practices. For instance, the SEC will presumably define a “de minimis” payment. Therefore, the SEC’s rulemaking process merits close attention.

Copyright © 2012 Foley Hoag LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Drawing on his extensive corporate and public policy experience, Gare Smith founded the firm’s corporate social responsibility and risk management practice to help clients adopt strategic policies to address the challenges of globalization. He advises corporations and nations on legal, political, and economic aspects of globalization and crisis management, including developing codes of conduct, compliance programs, and monitoring systems. He also provides guidance regarding the resolution of conflicts with governments, the media, unions, communities, and non-governmental...

202-261-7370

About the Author

Associate

Amy Lehr is part of Foley Hoag’s unique corporate social responsibility (CSR) practice. In this role, she provides advice to major multinational corporations on best practices with regard to human rights, labor rights, and indigenous rights issues, as well as on stakeholder relations with local communities, host governments, security providers, and non-governmental organizations. Working with clients in a broad range of industry sectors, she provides advice on managing both the challenges and the opportunities of globalization, as well as on risk management issues,...

202-261-7389

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.