Advertisement

May 25, 2013

Conservative Think Tank’s Plan Would Limit Securitization of Mortgages

The American Enterprise Institute offered a plan on January 20th  to eliminate the “bubble-inducing distortion” it blames for the recent financial crisis – mortgage underwriters Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The assessment stands at odds with the Center’s recent FactWatch which reviewed government data and concluded that while Fannie and Freddie contributed to the mortgage meltdown, Wall Street led the way.

The heart of the conservative think tank’s proposal for a government-free mortgage-finance system is two-fold:  phase out Fannie and Freddie, and allow only the most credit-worthy, or “prime mortgages,” to be securitized.

Prime mortgages are generally those granted to borrowers with FICO scores – a credit ranking lenders use to assess the safety of loans – of 660 or above. Subprime mortgages are usually made to those with scores under 620.

According to a September 2010 report from the Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fannie and Freddie’s regulators, the government sponsored enterprises hewed much closer to AEI’s proposed securitization standard. Between 2001 and 2008, an average 84 percent of mortgages those agencies acquired were extended to prime borrowers. Only 5 percent of the loans they acquired were “subprime.”

Mortgages that were bought up by the private market were less likely to qualify for prime designation. During the same eight-year period, only 47 percent were prime, compared with 32 percent subprime. Overall, Wall Street-backed mortgages were 4.5 times more likely to become seriously delinquent.

House Republicans have criticized the $150 billion in taxpayer funds injected into Fannie and Freddie since they were placed in government conservatorship in late 2008 and are expected to soon offer legislation that would wind down the mortgage giants. At the end of the month, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is due to release his recommendations about Fannie and Freddie, as required by the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill. 

Reprinted by Permission © 2013, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

American University Fellow

Amy Biegelsen won the Virginia Press Association’s 2009 Best in Show Award for a portfolio on health and environmental stories. She is the recipient of the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association’s Excellence in Journalism prize for a story on children’s mental health issues and is a two-time finalist for the Livingston Award for Young Journalists. She earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Chicago.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.