Advertisement

May 17, 2013

Country Fresh Market to Pay $95,000 to Settle EEOC Harassment and Retaliation Lawsuit

Female Grocery Store Employees Were Sexually Harassed, Some Forced to Quit, Federal Agency Charged

PITTSBURGH – A Brownsville, Pa.-based grocery store will pay $95,000 and provide significant equitable relief to settle a federal sexual harassment and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employ­ment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today, June 25, 2012.

The EEOC charged that Country Fresh Market, LLC knowingly permitted the flagrant sexual harassment of women who worked in the meat department by the department manager at the com­pany’s Brownsville store. The unwelcome harassment included physical touching and repeated sexual advances and comments.

Not only did company officials fail to take prompt action to stop the harassment, one company official threatened employees with termination for complaining about the abuse. Two women were forced to quit their jobs because of the intolerable situation, the EEOC said in the lawsuit.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits sexual harassment. Title VII also protects employees from retaliation for opposing sexual harassment or discrimination. The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Civil Action Number 2:11-cv-01211) after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement through its conciliation process.

In addition to the $95,000 in monetary relief to the four class members, the three-year consent decree resolving the case includes injunctive relief barring Country Fresh from engaging in sexual harassment, sex discrimination or retaliation. Country Fresh must create and enforce a harassment and retaliation policy which includes complaint procedures and requires company officials, managers and supervisors to actively monitor the work environment to make sure it is free from harassment or retaliation. The grocery market is required to train all company owners, managers, supervisors and employees on Title VII and post a notice regarding the settlement. Country Fresh is also mandated to report to the EEOC regarding its investigation and handling of any future complaints of harassment or discrimination as well as its compliance with the consent decree.

“Employers must make sure that company officials, managers and supervisors take swift action to stop workplace harassment,” said Spencer H. Lewis, Jr., district director of the EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office, which oversees Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia and parts of New Jersey and Ohio.

EEOC Regional Attorney Debra M. Lawrence added, “This settlement is designed to protect all Country Fresh employees from the indignity of sexual harassment and to ensure that no employee is retaliated against for exercising his or her federally protected right to oppose this or any other form of discrimination.”

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.