Advertisement

May 20, 2013

Court Dismisses Public Pension Fund's Bankruptcy Case

In our May 24 entry on this topic, the Northern Mariana Islands Retirement Fund (the “Fund”) was battling numerous challenges to its Chapter 11 eligibility. The dispute revolved around whether the Fund, which provides benefits to government workers and retirees, was a “governmental unit” as defined by the Bankruptcy Code. In a decision from the bench on June 1st, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Robert Faris affirmed his May 29th tentative ruling that the Fund is a “governmental unit” and, as such, is ineligible for Chapter 11.

While a full memorandum opinion granting the motion to dismiss is forthcoming, Judge Faris’s tentative ruling provides useful insight. In the tentative ruling, the Judge explained that “Congress did not intend that the Bankruptcy Code could solve all problems, least of all the financial problems of governmental units[,]” as the Bankruptcy Code explicitly prohibits a “governmental unit” from filing Chapter 11. The issue turned on the factors highlighted in our previous entry, those which focused on the formation and function of the Fund. Ultimately, the Court found three factors persuasive: (i) the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the “Commonwealth”) formed the Fund as a means of carrying out the government’s obligations to its current and retired employees; (ii) the Commonwealth retains significant influence over the Fund; and (iii) providing compensation and benefits to government employees (andonly government employees) is a quintessential governmental function. The Judge concluded that because the Fund acts solely as an intermediary between the government and its employees and retirees, with no private employer or nongovernmental employees involved, the Fund is a “governmental unit.”

Tentative Ruling on Motion to Dismiss.pdf

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Member

Bill is a Member in the firm’s Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Commercial Law Section. He practices primarily in the area of commercial law, workouts, and corporate reorganization, and has represented various institutional lenders, indenture trustees, bondholders, and other creditors, debtors, and trustees in all manner of insolvency proceedings in courts throughout the United States. His industry experience encompasses municipalities, airlines, hospitals and other health care facilities, retail, telecom, energy and clean tech, waste disposal, military housing, hotels...

(617) 348-1665

About the Author

Associate

Eric is an Associate in the Bankruptcy, Restructuring & Commercial Law Section and is based in the firm's Boston office.

Prior to joining the firm, he served as legal counsel at the Massachusetts State House. There, he worked for the State Representative for Marshfield and Scituate where he researched and reported on issues such as: affordable housing, end-of-life health care, court-appointed attorney regulations, the tax-expenditure budget and pension reform. Eric also drafted legislation regarding issues ranging from freedom of speech rights to nuclear power plant...

(617) 348-4913

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.