Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Curtailing the After-Hours Use of Blackberries by Non-Exempt Employees - Employment Tip of the Month

Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.

In recent years, wage and hour class actions have become very popular for plaintiffs' counsel and can lead to extraordinary potential liabilities for employers.  As a preliminary matter, it is important for employers to properly classify employees as either non-exempt or exempt under the applicable wage and hour laws.  Non-exempt employees must be paid overtime for any work performed over 40 hours in a given workweek; exempt employees are not entitled to receive overtime.  Professional, administrative and executive employees, certain computer professionals, and outside sales staff are generally considered exempt from the overtime laws.  Federal regulations, as well as judicial decisions interpreting those regulations, provide guidance as to who falls within those classifications.  Many employers incorrectly assume that if an employee receives a “salary,” he or she is automatically exempt.

Non-exempt employees must be compensated for time worked under all circumstances, including (a) when the time worked was not specifically authorized, (b) for work performed at the beginning and end of a shift, and (c) for time spent working from home via a blackberry or other similar device.  This last category has proved to be especially problematic and the subject of recent litigation, given the difficulties in tracking time worked remotely, as well as the culture to be available 24/7.  As a suggested method of controlling this issue, employers may wish to consider addressing this issue in their employee handbooks and to prohibit non-exempt employees from working beyond their scheduled work hours. Although non-exempt employees still must be paid even if they work without authorization, this can and should be addressed as a performance management issue as well.

This Alert has been prepared by Sills Cummis & Gross P.C. for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising or solicitation and should not be used or taken as legal advice. Those seeking legal advice should contact a member of the Firm or legal counsel licensed in their state. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Confidential information should not be sent to Sills Cummis & Gross without first communicating directly with a member of the Firm about establishing an attorney-client relationship. 

© Copyright 2013 Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.

About the Author

Trent S. Dickey has 29 years of experience representing major domestic and foreign corporations in all aspects of complex commercial and management-side employment litigation. His clientele spans a broad spectrum of industries in both the public and private sectors. Mr. Dickey has successfully litigated hundreds of cases, both jury and bench trials, in federal and state courts throughout the nation.

Mr. Dickey’s clients range from Fortune 100 companies and public utilities to significant private enterprises. His practice encompasses the defense of employment claims including...

(973) 643-5863

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.