May 22, 2012

Dairy Queen Restaurant Sued By EEOC for Sexual Harassment and Retaliation

Manager Did Not Address Harassment, Then Fired Employee for Complaining, Federal Agency Says

WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. – YS&J  Enterprises, Inc., which does business in Winston-Salem’s Hanes Mall as  Dairy Queen, violated federal law by subjecting a female employee to sexual  harassment and then firing her for complaining about it, the U.S. Equal  Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit filed  today.

According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, from approximately late  March 2009 through Aug. 23, 2009 when her employment ended, Chastity Hill-Cox  was subjected to harassment based on her sex by a male cashier. The EEOC contends that the harassment  consisted of the cashier talking explicitly about his sexual encounters, and  making sexual gestures in which he simulated sex acts. The lawsuit further alleges that the male  cashier called Hill-Cox offensive gender-based epithets such as “b---h,” “c--t,”  and “p---y” on a frequent basis. Hill-Cox  complained about the harassment to the restaurant manager, but the harassment  did not stop. According to the lawsuit,  Hill-Cox, who was at work, and her mother called the Winston-Salem police to report the  harassment. While the police were present  at the restaurant responding to her complaint, the manager fired Hill-Cox,  stating that Hill-Cox was “causing too many problems” for the company.

Sexual  harassment and retaliation for complaining about sexual harassment violate  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The EEOC filed suit in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of  North Carolina (Equal Employment Opportunity  Commission v. Y S& J Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a  Dairy Queen, (Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01103), after first  attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its conciliation  process. The EEOC seeks monetary damages  for Hill-Cox.

“An employee should not have to  tolerate any type of harassment based on sex, including profane gender-based  name calling or another employee’s explicit and offensive stories about sex,”  said Lynette A. Barnes, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District. “That behavior has no place at work. Employers are liable when they fail to  address harassment once they have knowledge that such behavior is  occurring.”

EEOC  Supervisory Trial Attorney Tina Burnside added, “The EEOC will vigorously  enforce Title VII, which protects an employee’s right to complain about sexual  harassment and not be fired in retaliation.”

The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment  discrimination. Further information  about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site at www.eeoc.gov.

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.