May 22, 2012

Deeds in Lieu of Foreclosure: A Workout Strategy for Commercial Real Estate Owners and Their Lenders

With delinquency rates rising and property values falling, many owners of commercial real estate are wondering whether to give their properties to the lender to avoid foreclosure. From a borrower's perspective, this workout strategy—known as a deed in lieu of foreclosure—offers several advantages:

  1. The debt is forgiven (if not specifically reserved by the creditor);
     
  2. The borrower or principal participants of the borrower are released from all or some portion of personal liability;
     
  3. The borrower avoids the time and expense of litigating a mortgage foreclosure case; and
     
  4. The lender may be willing to pay the taxes, title charges and other expenses of the transfer.

From a lender's standpoint, a deed in lieu of foreclosure is also advantageous, as it may be completed quickly without court intervention, resulting in a property that is immediately marketable once the deed is recorded. Furthermore, the lender controls the outcome of the process and can operate the property without a receiver, retain valuable tenants and collect all of the income from the project.

Not without Pitfalls

The process, however, has its pitfalls. Unless the offer of conveyance is truly voluntary—with no pressure, duress or undue influence by the lender—there is a risk that the borrower may later challenge the transaction. For this reason, the offer to "give back" the property should originate with the borrower in the form of a written offer submitted to the lender by the borrower or the borrower's attorney. After receiving an offer, the lender should reply to the borrower with a written acknowledgement. A lender is not under any duty to accept a deed from a borrower and thus it should carefully state the conditions, if any, under which it would consummate the transaction.

As a means of protecting themselves, most lenders will not accept a deed in lieu of foreclosure unless there are no other mortgages or subsequent liens on the property and there is no equity above the amount of the outstanding debt. Of particular concern is the prospect that a bankruptcy court might set the transaction aside in a subsequently filed bankruptcy.

While a deed in lieu of foreclosure is not a cure for every type of delinquency, borrowers, lenders and their counsel should consider this strategy as part of a responsible workout plan for distressed real estate loans.

© 2010 Much Shelist Denenberg Ament & Rubenstein, P.C.

About the Author

Principal

Jonathan D. Sherman is a member of the firm’s Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Real Estate practice groups. Drawing on more than two decades of litigation experience, Jon expanded his focus in recent years to encompass a broad range of commercial real estate matters for developers, owners, landlords, brokers and lenders. This diverse background allows him to assist clients...

312-521-2687

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.