August 30, 2014
August 29, 2014
August 28, 2014
Delaware Supreme Court Alters Fiduciary Duty Landscape for LLCs
Delaware has long been a preferred jurisdiction for organizing corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs). So when the Delaware Supreme Court speaks on important corporate and LLC issues, people listen.
Until recently, it was widely (though not uniformly) believed that, unless restricted or eliminated in an LLC Operating Agreement, the majority member or manager in an LLC owed a fiduciary duty to the other members similar to that of a partner in a partnership.
However, recently the Delaware Supreme Court called into question the existence of default fiduciary duties in Delaware LLCs. In Gatz Properties, LLC v. Auriga Capital Corp., 2012 Del. LEXIS 577 (Del. Nov. 7, 2012), the Delaware Supreme Court found that “the merits of the issue whether the LLC statute does – or does not – impose default fiduciary duties is one about which reasonable minds could differ.” Gatz, 32-33 n. 70.
The Gatz opinion does not resolve whether default fiduciary duties exist in Delaware. However, it highlights that the reasonable minds of the Delaware courts may not agree, which is significant.
Accordingly, those forming Delaware LLCs or investing in Delaware LLCs – particularly minority investors in Delaware LLCs – should carefully review their LLC Agreements on the issue of fiduciary duty. To be appropriately protected, the LLC Agreement should contain some positive statement about the existence and types of fiduciary duties that will be observed.
The Gatz decision could also have implications outside of Delaware, particularly in the many states that follow Delaware’s example of not expressly providing a fiduciary duty standard in their LLC Act.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- United Kingdom: A Reminder About Careful Drafting of Confidentiality Clauses for Shareholders
- SEC Charges New York Executive With Insider Trading Ahead of Client Announcements
- Pharmacies Avoid False Claims Act Suit: Fox Rx Inc. v. Omnicare Inc. et al.
- Most Convenient Forum is State of Company Headquarter, Tennessee Federal Judge Finds in Collective Action
- Made for the U.S.A Only: Second Circuit Holds That the Dodd-Frank Act’s Antiretaliation Provision Applies Only Domestically
- The Wal-Mart Decision: Just How Big A Blow Did the Delaware Supreme Court Deal To Corporations?