July 24, 2014

The Department of Energy Establishes Uniform Protocols for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings

The Department of Energy has just published a new series of protocols for calculating the savings from energy efficiency upgrades in homes, commercial buildings, and industrial facilities.  Although voluntary, the new protocols, issued on May 15, are designed to create a common approach for calculating energy savings based on common residential and commercial efficiency measures used in utility-based energy efficiency programs.

As it stands now, there are a multitude of differences in the methods by which public utility commissions, contractors, energy efficiency program administrators, and utilities in different jurisdictions and regions determine the savings from energy efficiency upgrades.  Without a centralized method for establishing these figures, the differences reduce the confidence that consumers have in efficiency savings and data.

The new protocols, titled Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures, were developed in close collaboration with the nation’s leading technical experts under the Uniform Methods Project, which were the first set of protocols for determining energy savings from energy efficiency programs and measures.  The Department of Energy designed the protocols to increase confidence in reported energy savings from energy efficiency programs and to spur further investment based on more reliable data.

The protocols are an entirely voluntary set of standards that do not provide stipulated values or specific criteria either for establishing statistical confidence or the accuracy of savings figures.  Instead, the protocols are meant to be a structure by which states, especially those with new energy efficiency programs, can apply uniform standards for establishing the said criteria.  Because the methods in the protocol were developed by industry and technical experts, the DoE hopes that energy efficiency program administrators can adopt them knowing that they are consistent with commonly accepted practices for measure savings from energy efficiency programs.

©1994-2014 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Sahir Surmeli, Energy, Cleantech, Attorney, Mintz Levin, Law firm

Sahir represents emerging growth and established energy and clean technology, life sciences and information technology companies, investors and investment banks in public offerings and private financings, mergers & acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic partnerships. In 2013, Sa was listed among the Top 100 Cleantech & Renewables Lawyers by Euromoney’s LMG Cleantech & Renewable Energy.

Sa serves as Co-chair of the firm's Energy & Clean Technology Practice, which serves more than 250 clients. Since 2006, the firm’s Energy & Clean...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.