Advertisement

June 18, 2013

Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division Approves Wellpoint's Acquisition of Amerigroup After Divestiture Permitting the Parties to Close Their Deal

On November 28, the DOJ Antitrust Division announced that it would not challenge WellPoint’s proposed acquisition of Amerigroup, paving the way for the parties to close their closely watched transaction on December 24. The deal -- valued at approximately $5 billion -- adds Amerigroup’s multi-state Medicaid insurance business to WellPoint’s existing portfolio of insurance products. WellPoint is the nation’s second largest health insurer.

The parties’ deal was initially announced in July, with the parties stating that they hoped to close the deal by year’s end. However, the Antitrust Division issued a “Second Request” for additional information from the parties in August, holding up the transaction while the Antitrust Division examined the potential competitive implications of the proposed deal. While both Amerigroup and WellPoint have operations in many states, the Antitrust Division’s concerns ultimately focused on the Northern Virginia Medicaid market, where both parties had operations. Despite the fact that Amerigroup’s Northern Virginia operations amounted to only approximately 55,000 of its total 2.7 million members, the Antitrust Division contended that the combination, if permitted to proceed as initially planned, “would have substantially lessened competition in the provision of Medicaid managed care plans in Northern Virginia.”

To address these concerns, Amerigroup subsequently announced that it would sell its Amerigroup Virginia subsidiary (which included its Northern Virginia Medicaid business) to Inova Health System, which operates five hospitals in Northern Virginia. Thereafter, Acting Assistant Attorney General Renata Hesse, who leads the Antitrust Division, announced that “the divestiture of Amerigroup Virginia will ensure continued competition in the markets for Medicaid managed care plans in Northern Virginia,” and that because the divestiture “addresses the department’s concerns,” the Antitrust Division would no longer object to the combination.

After receiving federal regulatory approval for the transaction, the parties were quickly able to gain approval from the necessary state regulators in over ten states, and closed the transaction on December 24. WellPoint has announced that, going forward, Amerigroup will be operated as an independent subsidiary.

© Copyright 2013 Dickinson Wright PLLC

About the Author

Member

Jim Burns is Co-Leader of the firm's Antitrust Practice Group.

Mr. Burns has focused his practice on antitrust law for over 25 years. During that time, he has litigated antitrust and related claims in trial and appellate courts all across the country, advised clients on antitrust compliance issues, and represented clients before the DOJ Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission on a wide variety of antitrust matters, including mergers and governmental investigations. While his antitrust practice is broad-based, he has had a particular focus on the representation of...

202-659-6945

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.