Advertisement

April 25, 2014

Department of Justice Narrows "Carve Out" Practice Regarding Corporate Plea Agreements

Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division recently announced changes to the division’s “carve-out practice” regarding corporate plea agreements. The changes aim to protect the privacy of those suspected but not yet charged with wrongdoing, and to spare uncooperative employees from being identified in a public document involving criminal conduct.

In the past, the Antitrust Division’s corporate plea agreements sometimes included non-prosecution deals for employees who cooperated and whose conduct did not warrant prosecution. However, the division excluded, or “carved out,” employees who were potentially guilty of wrongdoing. It also excluded a much broader group of individuals, including employees who refused to cooperate, employees against whom that division was still developing evidence, and employees who could not be located. The names of all carved-out employees were included in the corporate plea agreements, which were publicly filed in the district courts where the charges were brought.

The new policy implements two changes. First, the division will “no longer carve out employees for reasons unrelated to culpability.” In addition, the division will no longer include the names of carved-out employees in plea agreements. Instead, those names will be listed in an appendix, and the Department of Justice will ask the court for leave to file the appendix under seal. Baer noted that “absent significant justification, it is ordinarily not appropriate to publicly identify uncharged third-party wrongdoers.”

Assistant Attorney General Baer’s statement is available here.

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

William M. Regan, Katten Muchin Law Firm, Litigation Attorney
Partner

William M. Regan represents banks, issuers and senior executives in securities class actions, stockholder derivative cases, complex financial product litigation and enforcement actions. Bill has been involved in litigating some of the largest and most complex matters in the securities litigation field, including Thornburg Mortgage, Inc., Madoff/Fairfield Greenwich, Global Crossing, Enron, WorldCom and the Oracle special litigation committee insider trading investigation.

212.940.6541

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.