Advertisement

April 18, 2014

Department of Labor (DOL) Policy Allows Employers A Limited Opportunity To Re-Set Timing Of Annual Participant Fee Disclosures

The DOL’s new participant fee disclosures regulations took effect last year.  These rules require 401(k) and other participant-directed plans to provide participants with an annual disclosure of certain plan and fee information, including a comparison of plan investment alternatives.  Most plans provided the initial annual disclosure in July or August of 2012, and under the DOL regulations the deadline for each subsequent annual disclosure is the anniversary of the preceding notice.  For example, a plan that provided the initial disclosure to participants on August 2, 2012 had to provide this year’s disclosure no later than August 2, 2013.

Many in the 401(k) community have raised concerns about the timing requirements and have been asking the DOL to change the rules so that the participant fee disclosures can be coordinated with other plan notices or events.  In response, the DOL recently published a Field Assistance Bulletin that provides limited relief.  In essence, the DOL is allowing plans to postpone either this year’s or next year’s annual disclosure by up to six months, if the responsible plan fiduciary determines that doing so will benefit plan participants and beneficiaries.  If a plan fiduciary decides to re-set the notice cycle, the fiduciary should document the decision-making process, including the reasons why the re-set will benefit participants and beneficiaries.

This is a welcome change because it will allow plans to re-set the notice cycle to coincide with other plan events, such as annual open enrollment or the issuance of annual IRS safe harbor 401(k) notices.  However, this relief does not address a key problem – the requirement in the regulations that each year’s comparative chart be provided within 12 months of the immediately preceding one.  The DOL acknowledges that this is an issue, and it is considering whether to revise the regulations.

© 2014 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

Hugh practices in the areas of ERISA and Employee Benefits. He is currently representing corporations and other entities in the design and operation of retirement and welfare benefit plans and executive compensation packages, including matters concerning ERISA and Internal Revenue Code compliance. In his experience, Hugh has represented qualified plan sponsors in restating their plans to comply with the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and other changes in tax law, represented sponsors of employee stock ownership plans in connection with plan purchases of employer securities, including leveraged...

919-783-2908

About the Author

Partner

Nancy practices in the area of employee benefits and ERISA. She has significant experience designing and documenting retirement plans and executive compensation plans as well as providing administrative advice on these plans. Nancy has represented clients before the Internal Revenue Service and Department of Labor, and she has represented clients in matters involving employee benefit due diligence, negotiation and planning in the context of mergers and acquisitions.

Representative Experience

    • Designed and documented retirement plans
    • ...
704-342-5275

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.