April 24, 2014

DeWine and Lawmakers Introduce Ohio False Claims Act Legislation

March 7th, two members of the Ohio General Assembly introduced a bill to create the Ohio False Claims Act. The bill’s sponsors, Senator Jim Hughes (R-Columbus) and Senator Scott Oelslager (R-North Canton), noted that the bill is a tool to recover fraudulent funds and stop waste, fraud, and abuse of Ohio’s financial resources. The bill carries the full support of Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine. In a press conference yesterday, Attorney General DeWine said, “We have to get Medicaid fraud under control. There is absolutely no reason why Ohio should not have a False Claims Act.”

The bill, introduced as Senate Bill No. 143, would prohibit any person or entity from making false or fraudulent claims for payment to the state. Such a law would affect almost anyone doing business with the state, including health care professionals claiming reimbursement, government contractors, and grant recipients. The proposed legislation would allow the Attorney General’s office to issue civil investigative demands to collect information about potential violations. The civil investigative demand may require one to produce documents, answer written interrogatories, and/or give oral testimony regarding potential violations. 

The penalties for violating the law would include: triple damages, a civil penalty ranging from $5,500 to $11,000 for each violation, and all costs and attorney’s fees for bringing an action to recover the funds. The bill includes, however, lesser penalties for those who fully cooperate with any state investigation of a potential violation. These lesser penalties include double damages as well as all costs and attorney’s fees but do not include the heavy civil penalty. To receive the lesser penalty, a person or entity must voluntarily provide the Attorney General’s office with all information within thirty days of learning about the violation and before the person or entity discovers that an investigation has begun or a civil or criminal lawsuit is filed. In other words, a person or entity must voluntarily provide the information on its own initiative and not on threat of litigation. Full cooperation and disclosure after the person or entity learns of the investigation will not provide for the statutory lesser penalties. 

The proposed Ohio False Claims Act also contains provisions for whistleblower civil suits against violators. Whistleblowers stand to recover anywhere from 10 to 30% of the damages and penalties collected as well as their attorney’s fees and costs from bringing suit. Whistleblowers would be protected from retaliation or other discriminatory treatment by their employer under the proposed law. 

A link to the proposed legislation can be found here:

A link to Attorney General DeWine’s press release can be found here:

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author


D. Michael Crites is a Partner in the Litigation Department. Mr. Crites focuses his practice on federal court experience in complex civil litigation and white collar criminal matters, including healthcare fraud, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance issues and Federal False Claims Act Violations. He has extensive experience in complex civil and criminal litigation, product liability defense of manufacturers and suppliers, fiduciary litigation, criminal tax and securities fraud defense, and business litigation involving contract disputes, copyright, trademark, trade secret...


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.