Advertisement

May 22, 2013

DiMare Ruskin to Pay $150,000 and Furnish Nationwide Relief to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Lawsuit

Consent  Decree Settles Suit Against Tomato Grower Which Fired Women for Complaining  About Abuse, Federal Agency Charged

DiMare Ruskin, Inc., a Florida-based tomato grower and produce  provider, will pay $150,000 to two female farmworkers and take other  steps to prevent and address unlawful harass­ment and retaliation at its farms  and facilities nationwide as part of a three-year consent decree that will resolve  a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC),  the agency announced today. 

The EEOC’s lawsuit (Civil Action No.  2:11-cv-00158-UA-SPC,  filed in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida) charged that DiMare  Ruskin violated anti-discrimination laws when supervisors at one of its Immokalee,  Fla., locations subjected two female farmworkers to unlawful sexual harassment  during their approximately three months of employment in the 2008-2009 growing  season.  The EEOC further alleged that  DiMare Ruskin fired the women when they opposed the supervisors’ unlawful  conduct. 

Such alleged conduct violates Title  VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  The  EEOC filed suit after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement  through its conciliation process.

As required by the three-year  consent decree settling the suit, DiMare Ruskin will establish a nationwide anti-harassment  policy for employees to use to communicate complaints to the company.  Further, DiMare Ruskin will provide  nationwide training to its management and non-management employees on the  anti-discrimination laws enforced by EEOC, and will provide inform­ation to  EEOC concerning its handling of discrimination complaints for three years.

“Sexual harassment against women in the agricultural industry is a big  problem,” said Robert E. Weisberg, regional attorney of the Miami District  Office.  “DiMare Ruskin took a major step  in the right direction by agreeing to establish nationwide policies and  procedures designed to prevent sexual harassment in the future -- and to  provide a means for employees to complain when they feel they are being subjected  to it.  Also, the Coalition for Immokalee  Workers should be commended for its role in educating members of the Southwest  Florida farmworker community of their rights under federal anti-discrimination  laws.”

EEOC General Counsel P. David Lopez  added, “This is the latest in a series of successful EEOC  resolutions nationwide aimed to ensure that the protections of the  anti-discrimination laws extend to all employees in this country, even the most  vulnerable.  To have meaning, we must not  allow these protections to be impeded by employment in remote  agricultural areas, cultural barriers, or low wages.”

Malcolm Medley, director of the EEOC’s Miami District Office, further  commented, “It is incumbent upon employers to provide a meaningful mechanism  for employees to report unwanted harassment.   The EEOC is encouraged that DiMare Ruskin is taking steps to ensure that  its nationwide work force is able to report unlawful harassment, and that it  will be providing training to all of its employees on their rights and  responsibilities under the law.”

© Copyright 2012 - U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

About the Author

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is responsible for enforcing federal laws that make it illegal to discriminate against a job applicant or an employee because of the person's race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to discriminate against a person because the person complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit.

Most employers with at least 15...

800-669-4000

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.