May 23, 2017

May 22, 2017

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Distressed Assets in Connecticut: What to Know Before Jumping In

There are many benefits for out of state lenders or investors looking to engage in business in Connecticut, one of the wealthiest (per capita) states in the United States of America. For example, Connecticut has relatively stable property values. However, Connecticut also has a number of legal pitfalls for lenders or investors who acquire Connecticut mortgages as part of a loan sale transaction. These pitfalls may end up causing undue delays and unnecessary expense when it comes to the legal process. A lender or entity unfamiliar with Connecticut specific laws and procedures should, prior to committing to acquire an asset secured by property in Connecticut, undertake due diligence and seek advice on what programs and statutes are or are not applicable prior to consummating the deal. Below are a few of the procedural thickets that must be navigated prior to being able to seek to foreclose a mortgage deed, the most common form of collateral for a real estate transaction, in Connecticut.

Preliminarily (and interestingly), Connecticut is unique in the United States in that it, as of January 1, 2015, recognizes three separate and distinct methods of foreclosure of a mortgage deed: Strict Foreclosure (appropriation of the mortgaged property after passage of law days set by judicial order); Foreclosure by Sale (created by statute and permits judicially ordered and overseen auction process); and Foreclosure by Market Sale (created by statute and permits agreement for marketing and private sale of property by mortgagor with consent of the mortgagee). Every foreclosure commenced in Connecticut is a judicial proceeding regardless of which of the above three forms the judgment of foreclosure will eventually take. The fact that every foreclosure is a judicial action alone can create havoc to the plans of a party who is otherwise unfamiliar with the foreclosure process in Connecticut and is best understood up front before committing any sum to a transaction where the main source of potential recovery is a parcel of property in Connecticut.

Secondly, Connecticut has many legislatively imposed requirements which must be met prior to even commencing an action for foreclosure of a mortgage deed. The vast majority of these programs were implemented either during or immediately after the nancial crisis of 2007 through (roughly) 2014 and, accordingly, revolve around 1 to 4 family owner-occupied residential property but are nonetheless worded vaguely enough so that they arguably apply to non-owner occupied or commercial properties as well. Amongst these programs are the Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (“EMAP”), codified at Conn. Gen. Stat. 8-265dd, et seq., and the Foreclosure by Market Sale procedure, codi ed at Conn. Gen. Stat. 49-24b, et seq.

© Copyright 2017 Murtha Cullina

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Alene Gefner, Litigator, Murtha Cullina Law FIrm
Partner

Ms. Gfeller has extensive experience in the area of commercial law and her practice involves representation of a variety of clients in complex litigation matters in Connecticut. Ms. Gfeller’s practice is diverse and covers many aspects of litigation including lender liability, foreclosures, construction, landlord/tenant matters, receiverships, UCC related litigation, pre/post judgment remedies, replevins and collection. Ms. Gfeller devotes significant time representing financial institutions in all aspects of a default including commercial workouts, modifications, restructures, forbearance...

860-240-6145
Andrew P. Barsom, Murtha Cullina, Creditor's Rights Lawyer, Bankruptcy Filings Attorney
Counsel

Andrew Barsom is Counsel in Murtha Cullina LLP’s Litigation Department where his practice is focused primarily within the Bankruptcy & Creditor’s Rights, Long Term Care and Retail & Hospitality practice groups.  Mr. Barsom’s main responsibility within each of these practice groups is focused on the collection of debts on behalf of clients of the Firm whether derived from contractual rights; leasehold obligations; for services provided or any combination of the above.  Mr. Barsom routinely appears in Courts across the state of Connecticut to advocate on behalf of the Firm’s clients in foreclosure actions; breach of contract actions, prejudgment remedy applications and summary process (eviction) actions.

860-240-6132