May 23, 2012

DNR Receives Petition to Adopt Rules on Silica Air Emissions

On November 22, 2011, 10 citizens petitioned the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (“WDNR”) to adopt rules to govern emissions of silica as a hazardous air pollutant. 

Triggered by the recent increase in frac sand mining activity in Wisconsin, the petition makes three requests:

  1. Include Respirable Crystalline Silica (“RSC”) as a hazardous air pollutant in NR 445 – WDNR’s air toxics rule;

  2. Establish an emission standard of “3 micrograms per cubic meter with a time period of annual” – based on the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Reference Exposure Level; and

  3. Require monitoring sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the standard.

The Petition represents a next step in the debate about if and how to regulate airborne silica that began in 2000 when WDNR revised NR 445. That rule directed WDNR to conduct a study of amorphous and crystalline silica, to “evaluate the sources and amounts of emissions and alternative strategies for minimizing public health risks” and to report progress to the WDNR citizen advisory board by July 1, 2006.

WDNR released a draft Silica Study in December 2010, and issued the final Silica Study in August 2011. In the Executive Summary of the final Silica Study, WDNR stated (p. 2): 

“A recurring theme from the literature review and survey is that very little conclusive information exists regarding sources, controls or levels of silica present in ambient air. This lack of data means it is not currently possible to determine conclusively whether or to what extent the quantity, duration or types of silica emissions in the state may be a public health concern. It would take significant additional efforts to fill in these data gaps. That said, Wisconsin has regulated PM for 40 years. The controls for PM are the same controls for crystalline silica. This means that for those crystalline silica sources where PM is controlled, crystalline silica emissions are also reduced.”

While the petition is framed to address “bedrock sandstone mines and associated processing plants”, the requested rules could apply to any source of airborne silica, including other non-metallic mining and rock crushing operations, foundries, glass manufacturing, abrasive blasting, farming, masonry and concrete removal. 

Where, as here, there is no federal hazardous air pollutant standard, Wis. Stat. s. 285.27(2)(b) requires that DNR make certain written findings in order to adopt a state emission standard for a hazardous air pollutant. Enacted in 2003 (2003 Wisconsin Act 118) this procedure has little precedent. In addition, recent revisions to agency rulemaking procedures enacted as part of 2010 Wisconsin Act 21 add time and procedural steps to the rulemaking process. As a result, if DNR determines to proceed with rulemaking as Petitioners request, the process could take several years.

DNR staff are reviewing the petition and next steps are currently undetermined. Stay tuned for future Alerts as more information becomes available.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

As a partner in the firm’s Land and Resources Practice Group, Linda Bochert helps her clients establish and maintain effective working relationships with state and federal environmental regulatory agencies. She serves in various policy advisory roles to state agencies, including the Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Revenue. Her clients benefit from her unique understanding of the workings of regulatory agencies and her ability to develop mutually beneficial solutions to regulatory issues. Ms. Bochert also co-chairs our firmwide Sustainability...

608-283-2271

About the Author

Mr. Palmer's clients benefit from his unique experience as both a lawyer and technical consultant. During the last 19 years, Mr. Palmer has relied on his varied experience to assist clients representing numerous industries, including petroleum refineries, automobile manufacturers, electric utilities, mining companies, defense contractors, aerospace companies, paper manufacturers, printers, construction contractors, agricultural operations, and commercial transporters.

608-283-4432

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.