Advertisement

June 18, 2013

Do Law Students Receive Sufficient Real-World Training?

Recent articles appearing in the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, respectively, question whether our nation’s law schools are providing sufficient practical training to their students. It is an age-old criticism of law schools that the graduating law student is not equipped to immediately begin practicing his/her trade. It is true that many students graduate from law school without ever seeing real lawyers engaged in litigation or witnessing a business transaction, even a simple home loan closing. 

Allison Connelly, a professor at the University of Kentucky College of Law and Director of the UK Legal Clinic, reports that the University of Kentucky recognizes this shortcoming and has taken several steps to address the issue. At the UK Legal Clinic, approximately 35 students a year are given the opportunity to represent real clients with real legal problems. Professor Connelly oversees the program and provides guidance to the students. They handle everything from the preparation of estate planning documents to uncontested divorces. Professor Connelly signs all pleadings and other court papers but the students are allowed to meet with the clients, participate in negotiations with the opposing party, and argue cases before the court or administrative agency.

Professor Connelly also reports that the American Bar Association requires all law schools, as part of their accreditation process, to require that each student take at least one course involving practical legal training. UK fulfills this requirement through its legal writing, moot court and litigation skills classes taught primarily by practicing attorneys. In addition, UK has expanded its offerings of externships, placing students at The Public Defender’s office, the Fayette Commonwealth Attorney’s office, and other government agencies. 

Notwithstanding UK’s efforts, local law firms continue to provide the necessary training to newly-hired associate attorneys. Several examples of training programs include: 

Pro Bono Programs 

Many local firms encourage their young associates to participate in the Fayette County Pro Bono Program which provides legal services to indigent clients. Generally, an experienced attorney within the firm oversees the work of the younger associates but client counseling, preparation of pleadings and courtroom appearances are handled by the younger associates. 

Mentoring Programs 

Most firms also have a formal mentoring program, pairing their more experienced attorneys with a younger attorney, with the experienced attorney providing day-to-day mentoring advice to the younger attorney within a particular practice area. Younger attorneys accompany the experienced attorneys to depositions, hearings, trials and closings where they can observe “good lawyering” up close. Follow-up sessions between the mentor and “student” allow for a full discussion of what occurred and how things might have been handled differently. 

Younger associates at smaller firms may experience a steeper learning curve as they may be shoved into the fire of first chair responsibility sooner than their classmates at larger firms. It should be noted, however, that there are experienced solo practitioners and attorneys at firms who willingly serve as mentors to these younger attorneys who seek their help. 

Recently, one local firm required six of its litigation associates to participate in an in-house mock trial exercise. The associates were assigned to represent the parties in a “make believe” case and each week over a one-month period, the associates were required to make oral presentations to a judge and jury composed of experienced attorneys from the firm. Each associate was required to make an opening statement, conduct a direct and cross examination of a witness and present a closing argument. At the end of each week’s presentations, the experienced attorneys critiqued the younger attorneys’ performances, providing constructive advice and encouragement. 

Leadership Programs 

In addition to providing practical training to their young lawyers, most firms also provide guidance on the non-practicing elements of being a lawyer. For instance, one local firm has a program called the “Leadership Academy” which is an eight month orientation program designed to help first year associates and recent lateral hires to learn the ins and outs of client relationships, timekeeping, business development, business dinner etiquette, firm policies, etc. Another local firm has a similar program called “Backpacks to Briefcases” where the younger attorneys are introduced to the firm culture, philosophy and day-to-day routines followed by a typical lawyer at the firm. 

The practice of law is becoming more complicated. Lawyers at larger firms are expected to become proficient in discreet areas of the law. Law schools cannot be expected to provide practical training in each one of these practice areas. However, programs such as the Legal Clinic at the University of Kentucky can provide a baseline of training heretofore not available to its students. Meanwhile, as has probably been the case for as long as there have been lawyers, experienced lawyers will continue to provide the bulk of the practical training to their younger colleagues.

As seen in Business Lexington.

© 2013 Dinsmore & Shohl LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Partner

John Rhorer is a Partner in the Corporate Department. John advises clients on real estate and commercial lending matters. He has substantial experience in the mineral industry, consulting clients on titles, leasing, contracting and other transactional matters. John advises buyers, sellers and lenders in all manner of business transactions. John is a member of the firm's Recruiting Committee. 

859-425-1015

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.