May 23, 2012

Dodd Frank Update — Several Developments of Note:

CFTC PROPOSES EXTENSION OF ITS TEMPORARY EXEMPTIVE RELIEF FOR SWAP REGULATIONS:

  •  The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) proposed an amendment to its order of July 14, 2011, providing temporary exemptive relief from the Dodd-Frank Act (Dodd-Frank) requirements related to swaps as a result of the delay in the adoption of final rules relating to derivatives. First, the CFTC proposes to extend the expiration dates under the July 14th order for provisions of Dodd-Frank that become effective automatically in July 2011 or provisions that were “self-effectuating” due from December 31, 2011, to the earlier of (i) July 16, 2012, or (ii) the date on which the applicable definitions become final and effective. Secondly, subject to certain conditions, the CFTC’s amendment proposes further temporary relief for swap transactions that currently meet the conditions of CFTC’s exemptive regulations for swap agreements. The CFTC’s proposal would allow swap transactions that are within the scope of the swap exemptions as of December 31 to remain subject to temporary exemptive relief until the earlier of July 12, 2011, or such time as the CFTC determines subject to certain conditions. Comments to the proposed amendments can be submitted to CFTC until November 25, 2011. Click here for the text of the proposed amendment.

REGULATORS PROPOSE VOLCKER RULE:

  • As discussed in last week’s newsletter, the Federal banking agencies and the SEC are requesting comments on their proposal to implement what is commonly known as the Volcker Rule. For more information on this proposed regulation, please view the GT Alert prepared by Carl Fornaris, Genna Garver and Daniel Blanchard, which discusses the proposal’s general prohibition by any banking entity from engaging in proprietary trading or from acquiring or retaining an ownership interest in, sponsoring, or having certain relationships with a hedge fund or private equity and its related exemptions. 
©2012 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Shareholder

Sylvie Durham has been practicing law since 1985 and has experience on both the legal and business sides of derivatives, synthetic transactions, structured products and hedge funds. She spent three years as the general counsel and investment director at a New York-based structured credit fund. Prior to that, she was an investment banker and the head of structured equity products at BNP Paribas where she concentrated on structuring equity derivative products for corporations and hedge funds. Prior to BNP Paribas, she was a partner in the Structured Finance & Derivatives...

212-801-6923

About the Author

Shareholder

Carl Fornaris is co-chair of Greenberg Traurig's National Financial Institutions Group.

Mr. Fornaris concentrates his practice in the representation of financial services firms in all aspects of their business. In particular, he represents U.S. and non-U.S. firms on finance and corporate matters and provides supervisory and compliance counseling for...

305.579.0626

Contributors

Of Counsel

Genna Garver is of counsel in the Corporate & Securities Practice of Greenberg Traurig’s New York office. She represents financial institutions in a variety of transactional and regulatory matters with a focus on investment advisers, hedge funds and other private investment funds. Genna advises clients on formation and offering matters for domestic and offshore funds, mergers and acquisitions, securities regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and state investment adviser registration and exemptions, the development and implementation of Advisers Act...

212-801-9270

About the Author

Associate

Dmitry G. Ivanov is an associate in the Corporate & Securities Practice of Greenberg Traurig's New York office.

212-801-2210

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.