May 23, 2012

DOL Clarifies Electronic Fee Disclosure Guidance

In September 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) provided interim guidance, in the form of a temporary enforcement policy, detailing how the newly required disclosures for participant-directed retirement plans could be delivered in electronic form.[1] This guidance, Technical Release 2011-03, raised a number of questions. DOL has now provided some clarification by revising and restating its prior release as Technical Release 2011-03R.[2] The revised release addresses two specific points relating to the use of continuous-access websites for disclosure purposes:

  • Availability for investment-related information. The original release made a distinction in the ability to use website access between the two disclosure categories under the new rules: "plan-related information" and "investment-related information." It said that "plan-related information" could be provided through a secure, continuous-access website, in accordance with DOL's prior guidance on using this approach to furnish participants with pension benefit statements, but that the approach would not be available for "investment-related information." This raised a question as to whether investment-related information could be provided along with pension benefit statements. The revised technical release clarifies that investment-related information can be furnished as part of, or along with, pension benefit statement information, but only so long as this is done electronically in accordance with the current electronic disclosure rule or the interim disclosure approach described in the release, or in paper form. The simplified mechanism described in DOL's prior guidance, specifically for the electronic provision of pension benefit statements through website access, continues not to be available for investment-related information.
  • Availability under interim disclosure approach. The original release described an interim approach that could be used as the basis for providing electronic disclosure to plan participants pending further guidance. However, it did not specify that continuous-access websites could be used under this approach. The revised technical release clarifies that electronic disclosures may be furnished using continuous-access websites under the interim approach.

These clarifications address only some of the concerns raised in response to the prior guidance. Further clarification may be necessary to address other details of the interim approach, such as what constitutes sufficient evidence of "electronic interaction" between a participant and the plan to avoid the need to provide the participant with a paper notice.


[1]. See the Morgan Lewis LawFlash, "DOL Releases Interim Guidance on Electronic Delivery of Participant-Directed Retirement Plan Disclosure" (Sept. 15, 2011), available at http://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/EB_LF_Participant-DirectedPlanDisclosureGuidance_15sept11.pdf.

[2]. To view Technical Release 2011-03R, visit http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/newsroom/tr11-03r.html.

Copyright © 2012 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Of Counsel

Michael B. Richman is of counsel in Morgan Lewis's Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation Practice. In addition to employee benefits, Mr. Richman's practice includes the investment management and securities areas. His principal focus is on matters under the ERISA fiduciary responsibility rules. These have included fiduciary governance of ERISA plans, prohibited transaction issues in proposed transactions and transactions under government investigation, and preparing requests to the U.S. Department of Labor for prohibited transaction exemptions and advisory opinions. Mr...

202-739-5036

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.