May 23, 2012

DOL Notifies Workers of 17 Facilities Associated with Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act about Potential Eligibility under EEOICPA

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Department of Labor is notifying former workers of 17 facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act about compensation and medical benefits potentially available to them under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, which is administered by the department's Division of Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation. Survivors of qualified workers also may be entitled to benefits.

Former employees may be eligible if they worked at any of the facilities during a period of covered U.S. Department of Energy-funded environmental remediation efforts. Additionally, three facilities already covered under the EEOICPA now have expanded periods of eligibility.

On Dec. 15, 2010, DEEOIC determined that the Uranium Mill at Shiprock, N.M., was a covered DOE facility for the purposes of the EEOICPA. Given that Uranium Mill at Shiprock was only one of the facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act, DEEOIC conducted a review considering whether additional facilities met the statutory definition of a covered DOE facility under the EEOICPA. Based on that review, DEEOIC determined that the above-mentioned facilities meet the definition.

On July 31, 2001, the Labor Department began administering Part B of the EEOICPA. Part B covers current and former workers who have been diagnosed with cancer, beryllium disease or silicosis, and whose illness was caused by exposure to radiation, beryllium or silica while working directly for DOE, that department's contractors or subcontractors, a designated Atomic Weapons Employer or a beryllium vendor. Part E, created by an amendment to the EEOICPA on Oct. 28, 2004, provides federal compensation and medical benefits to DOE contractors and subcontractors who worked at covered facilities and sustained an illness as a result of exposure to toxic substances.

The EEOICPA also provides additional compensation for uranium workers who worked at facilities covered by the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, which is administered by the U.S. Department of Justice. To assist individuals regardless of where they live, the department has 11 stationary resource centers located throughout the country. These resource centers provide an initial point-of-contact for individuals interested in filing a claim under EEOICPA, and staff provide both in-person and telephone-based assistance. For additional information about how to file a claim under EEOICPA, call toll-free at             866-888-3322       or visit the DEEOIC's website at http://www.dol.gov/owcp/energy/.

Editor's note: A list of the 17 facilities and the periods of covered DOE-funded environmental remediation efforts follows this release. Facilities with an expanded eligibility period are indicated by an asterisk.


Facilities associated with the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act

  1. Uranium Mill in Monument Valley, Ariz., from May 1989 through February 1990 and September 1992 through May 1994
  2. Uranium Mill in Tuba City, Ariz., from January 1985 through February 1986 and January 1988 through April 1990
  3. Climax Uranium Mill in Grand Junction, Colo., from December 1988 through August 1994
  4. Uranium Mill in Gunnison, Colo., September 1991 through December 1995
  5. Uranium Mill in Maybell, Colo., from May 1995 through September 1998
  6. Uranium Mill in Naturita, Colo., May 1994 through November 1994 and June 1996 through September 1998
  7. New Uranium Mill in Rifle, Colo., September 1988 through September 1989 and April 1992 through October 1996
  8. Old Uranium Mill in Rifle, Colo., September 1988 through September 1989 and April 1992 through October 1996
  9. Uranium Mill No. 1 in Slick Rock (East), Colo., in 1995 and 1996
  10. Uranium Mill No. 2 in Slick Rock (West), Colo., in 1995 and 1996
  11. Uranium Mill in Lowman, Idaho, in 1992 and from 1994 to the present
  12. Uranium Mill in Ambrosia Lake, N.M., from July 1987 through April 1989 and October 1992 through July 1995
  13. Uranium Mill and Disposal Cell in Lakeview, Ore., from 1986 through 1989
  14. Uranium Mill in Falls City, Texas, from January 1992 through June 1994
  15. Uranium Mill in Mexican Hat, Utah, from July 1987 through October 1987 and September 1992 through February 1995
  16. Uranium Mill in Riverton, Wyo., from May 1988 through September 1990
  17. Uranium Mill in Converse County (Spook Site), Wyo., from April 1989 through September 1989
  18. *Uranium Mill in Durango, Colo., already covered for 1948 through 1953, now also is covered for October 1986 through May 1991
  19. *Vitro Manufacturing in Canonsburg, Pa., already covered as a beryllium vendor facility for 1948, and as an Atomic Weapons Employer facility for 1942 through 1959 (with residual radiation coverage for 1958 through 1985), now also is covered for 1983 through 1985 and for 1996
  20. *Uranium Mill in Monticello, Utah, already covered for 1948 through 1960, now also is covered for remediation performed by DOE and DOE contractors under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act for 1983 through 2000

*Additional years of qualifying employment have been added to these three facilities currently covered under the EEOICPA.

© Copyright 2012 U.S. Department of Labor

About the Author

Our Mission is to foster, promote, and develop the welfare of the wage earners, job seekers, and retirees of the United States; improve working conditions; advance opportunities for profitable employment; and assure work-related benefits and rights.

866-487-2365

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.