July 23, 2014

Dramatic Changes to Divorce Currently Being Considered by the Florida Politicians

We who practice in the area of divorce law of law, as well as our clients, have been anxiously watching a bill move through the Florida government.  It has passed the Senate and now moves to the House of Representatives. The positions are polarized and those interested anxiously await what may be dramatic changes to family law in Florida.  A very good summary below is a quick read on what is at stake from

A vote from the Florida House of Representatives regarding the proposed changes to alimony and time-sharing in Florida is expected as soon as tomorrow, April 18, 2013.  The bill, better known as the 2013 Alimony Reform Bill, SB 718, passed by a 29 to 11 by the Florida Senate on April 4, 2013.  As proposed, the bill would have a significant impact on divorced and divorcing couples.  Some highlights of the bill include:

• Eliminating permanent alimony.

• Eliminating consideration of the standard of living established during the marriage as a factor in determining alimony.

• Creating presumptions for earning ability imputed to an obligee.

• Requiring written findings justifying factors regarding an alimony award or modification.

• Creating evidentiary thresholds for certain awards of alimony or modification.

• Creating a presumption that the parties will have a lower standard of living after divorce.

• Limiting alimony based on formulas that take into account relative incomes and the length of the marriage.

• Providing that alimony terminates upon the obligee reaching retirement age.

• Shifting the burden of proof regarding the need for alimony to the obligee in certain circumstances.

• Prohibiting modification of alimony based solely on a reduction in child support.

• Allowing bifurcation of a dissolution case if pending more than 180 days, and requires bifurcation if pending over 365 days.

• Allowing modification or termination of existing alimony awards.

•Providing a schedule for review of existing awards of alimony.
The bill would also impact child issues, in that it would create a presumption that it is in the best interest of the child to allow for equal time-sharing of a minor child.

If passed, the bill would take effect July 1, 2013.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2014. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Rebecca Palmer, Family, Marital Attorney, Lowndes, law firm

Rebecca Palmer leads the Family & Marital Law practice. She has a broad background in providing alternative dispute resolution, general litigation, and collaborative law issues for domestic disputes for nineteen years. Rebecca's matters range from pre-marital agreements, divorce, and adoptions to difficult dissolutions, complex financial issues and custody cases. A Supreme Court Certified Family Mediator, she is experienced in all methods of case resolution, including mediation, arbitration, facilitation and negotiations to serve individuals as well as businesses.



Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.