May 23, 2012

E-payment Co. Makes Millions Selling Customer Data

Risk Management Monitor

Call me cynical, but your personal information is no longer safe . . . with any company.

Especially e-payment firm Octopus Holdings. The company has admitted to selling its customers’ personal information since January 2006 and making a pretty penny off it — a whopping HK$44 million ($5.7 million USD). The personal data of 1.97 million customers was sold to six different companies, including Cigna Worldwide Life Insurance.

Octopus CEO Prudence Chan, who was speaking at a private hearing with the Hong Kong Privacy Commission, was quoted as saying the company has pledged not to provide personal data to other companies in future. Octopus had earlier denied it sold customer data, until it was called up by the Commission to testify at an official investigation of the company’s practices, noted a report by Apple Daily. Chan then retracted the denial.

As one would expect, Chan is now facing pressure to resign for her mismanagement and deceiving statements.

Something good can actually come from this, however. Hong Kong’s Privacy Commissioner, Roderick Woo, proposed introducing a law to make it a criminal offense for companies to sell customers’ data. Let’s hope that proposal is taken seriously and that similar laws are proposed here in the U.S.

For your enjoyment (or to merely raise the level of mistrust you may feel towards businesses and/or individuals), here is a short list of instances when the shameful act of selling customer data has occurred:

Of course, these are just a few examples of stolen customer data. If there were a master list, it would be too large for this blog. Though the U.S. has enacted the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, the Health Insurance Portability Act and the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, there is no all-encompassing law regulating the acquisition, storage or use of personal data. Let’s hope that changes soon.

The above article is reprinted from the Risk Management Monitor - the official blog of Risk Management magazine.

Reprinted with permission from the Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2010 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Editor

Emily Holbrook is the editor of Risk Management magazine and the Risk Management Monitor blog.

212-655-5915

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.