May 23, 2012

Easy Steps To Avoid Having Your Brand Used In An Adult Website Address

Corporations spend tens of millions of dollars each year to file trademark registrations and to protect their brands. So imagine explaining to the CEO why your trademark is now being used in an adult website (domain name) address.

Domain names are controlled by an international organization known as ICANN—The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. ICANN has the job of assigning names and internet protocol (IP) addresses to websites.

ICANN recently approved the registration of domain names using a (.xxx) suffix for the website address. The (.xxx) suffix was created to be used only by adult websites. This new domain name suffix is intended to make it less likely for a web browser to unwittingly reach an adult website.

To reduce the possibility that a company's brand might be misused by an adult domain name owner, ICANN created an "opt-out" procedure for owners, assignees, or licensees of "traditional" trademarks who want to prevent their trademarks from being used for registration of an adult website (.xxx) domain name. Any trademark owner whose trademark was registered anywhere in the world prior to September 1, 2011, is eligible to apply for opt-out treatment. If a trademark owner chooses the opt-out treatment, that trademark will not be eligible for registration as an (.xxx) adult domain name for a period of (10) years.

To apply for an opt-out, you must file an opt-out application with an accredited website registrar (in the U.S. those include Go Daddy and Melbourne IT). The deadline for filing the application is October 28, 2011. Some registrars are recommending that trademark owners file their applications by October 21, 2011, in order to ensure that your opt-out applications are properly processed and verified.

Trademark owners have to file one application per trademark and pay a fee of approximately $250 per mark.

Companies are not required to file opt-out applications and may choose to continue relying on the traditional legal remedies for attacking a misuse of their trademark — i.e. filing an arbitration with ICANN under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Procedures or filing a suit under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. However, these methods can be far more costly than the $250 per trademark fee required to file an opt-out application.

©2012 von Briesen & Roper, s.c

About the Author

Attorney

Linda specializes in the areas of new media, social media, internet law and content, interactive television, consumer privacy, software licensing and trademark law.

414-287-1274

About the Author

Shareholder

Mark F. Foley is a Shareholder at von Briesen & Roper, s.c. with more than 25 years experience meeting the complex business and legal needs of clients ranging from individual business owners to industry trade associations and Global 500 companies.

414-287-1404

Contributors

Chair, Intellectual Property Department

Alex Gerasimow is chair of the Intellectual Property (IP) Section. He applies his extensive Fortune 500 background and IP expertise to provide practical advice and creative solutions to clients interested in building and protecting their company’s intellectual property, while striving to minimize risks. Alex has served as chief IP counsel or as senior IP counsel to four Fortune 500 manufacturing companies. Based on that experience, Alex understands the needs of corporate clients and how to provide effective, actionable advice. In addition to his knowledge of electrical, mechanical...

414-287-1401

About the Author

Chair, Business and Corporate Law Practice Group

Tom Kammerait is a business attorney and the Chair of the Business and Corporate Law Practice Group. Tom represents businesses on all aspects of their business and corporate needs including transactional matters, tax, general corporate, real estate, technology, and estate planning issues. Tom’s unique approach helps clients set priorities for enhancing the value of their businesses and identifying risk management strategies. His core client base is emerging and established technology businesses, manufacturers, distributors, manufacturer’s representatives and service companies....

414-287-1413

About the Author

Shareholder

Gottlieb John Marmet is a Shareholder in the firm’s Litigation and Risk Management Practice Group. John is a registered patent attorney and focuses his practice on intellectual property law, patent prosecution, litigation, product liability and toxic tort matters.

414-287-1533

About the Author

Attorney

James Wawrzyn is a member of the Business Practice Group. He counsels clients on mergers and acquisitions, equity financings, general corporate practice, and commercial contract negotiation and drafting. James has advised sellers and buyers in a wide variety of transaction structures, including purchases and sales of stock, purchases and sales of assets, and public and private company mergers. James is also skilled in the preparation and negotiation of technology-based agreements such as master services, development and licensing agreements.

414-287-1476

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.