Advertisement

July 23, 2014

EEOC, FTC Provide Tips on Use of Employment Background Checks

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) often looks to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) for advice and assistance on issues related to the various laws, executive orders, and regulatory guidelines that affect the workplace. Therefore, it is no surprise, and perhaps even past time, that the FTC and EEOC co-authored two documents (Background Checks: What Employers Need to Know and Background Checks: What Job Applicants and Employees Should Know) explaining how the agencies’ respective laws apply to background checks performed on job applicants and current employees. 

The documents are noticeably different, as they are written for two different audiences. The EEOC guidance is written for employers and outlines the steps that should be taken when an employer obtains a background check on an applicant or current employee. In addition to reminding employers to not discriminate based on certain protected characteristics, the guidance explains the specific steps that must be taken, which are not necessarily intuitive, before an employer can deny employment (or take other adverse action) based on what turns up in a background check. The guidance also provides information on how long employers must retain these records and the proper method by which such records should be destroyed.

The FTC guidance is written for applicants and employees. It describes generally what is required and prohibited under applicable federal laws. It also states that, “Even if the employer treated you the same as everyone else, using background information still can be illegal discrimination . . . [, and] [i]t doesn’t matter whether or not the information was in a background report.” The guidance includes specifics (and web links) on how to report illegal discrimination and what to do if a background check reveals negative information. 

As noted by the FTC and EEOC, hiring decisions are among the most important for any employer, but the process can be complex. It is further complicated by the fact that while the FTC enforces the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), the authority to issue regulations and collect data on FCRA violations has been assigned to the newly created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”). 

Still, these joint publications provide some guidance and serve as a reminder that both the FTC and EEOC are focused on the effect of background checks on employment. Employers should review their background check practices to ensure compliance and avoid undue government scrutiny. In addition, employers should be mindful of the numerous state and local laws that prohibit or limit the use of background information in making employment decisions. 

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2014

About the Author

Kevin D. Holden, Health Care, Litigation, Jackson Lewis Law Firm
Office Managing Shareholder

Kevin D. Holden is Office Managing Shareholder of the Richmond, Virginia office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

804-649-0404

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.