Advertisement

May 23, 2013

Eight Crisis Management Lessons from the Chilean Mine Rescue

Risk Management - RIMS

The whole world let out a collective sigh of relief after the last of the miners was rescued in Chile. With a safe recovery behind us, we can now look back on the crisis management lessons learned during the 69 days that 33 men feared for their lives while trapped a half-mile underground. The Chilean government showed not only leadership but remarkable communications savvy throughout the ordeal. In many ways, it is quite similar to the BP disaster.

Here are eight lessons to remember.

Chile

1. Take Responsibility

In stepping in to take over the rescue operations, Chile's President Sebasti?n Pi?era took an enormous calculated risk. The decision could have been influenced by criticism of his government's slow response to the March earthquake near the city of Concepci?n. Whatever the rationale, the Chilean actions contrast sharply with what we saw in the United States post-Hurricane Katrina, and after the BP disaster, during which the government chose to leave BP in charge. For Pi?era, it clearly paid off.

2. Manage Expectations

Remember the initial estimates that the miners might be out by Christmas? Whether simple caution or a communications strategy, this was a masterstroke. It took some of the pressure off, enabled the government to succeed beyond all hopes and made authorities look competent in the process.

3. Have a Plan

Early on, the Chilean government communicated a Plan A and a Plan B for rescue in a clear, methodical way. It looked organized and in control. Compare their performance with that of BP, which lurched from one solution to the next, even crowdsourcing ideas for stopping the spill in a way that suggested uncertainty and incompetence.

4. Accept Help -- But Maintain Control

A fascinating aspect of the rescue was the technical help and advice the government sought from private companies and experts at NASA and elsewhere. The authorities made it clear that no effort would be spared to guarantee a safe resolution to the crisis. But they also kept tight control over communications, ensuring that the government was the chief source of updates. This is the first rule of crisis PR.

5. Sweat the Small Stuff

One of the biggest stories around the rescue operation was the focus on the smallest details of the plan, from the construction of the tube to the monitoring of each miner's health. The government's meticulousness conveyed not only competence, but caring.

6. Be Transparent

The Chilean PR machine was proactive, consistent and transparent in updating the media. They never seemed to obscure facts or delay disclosure, which often happens when the pressure is on.

7. Be Social

The government used social media to support its communications, setting up a Flickr page of photos that documented every dramatic moment as the miners began to emerge into the light.

8. Be There

Chile's minister of mining was at the site virtually around the clock, and President Pi?era appeared frequently as operations shifted into high gear. Sure, the head guy can get updates from his office, but when lives are at stake, the presence of leadership really matters. Sometimes you just have to be there.

_________

Dorothy Crenshaw is CEO and creative director of Crenshaw Communications. She originally published this article on her company's imPRessions blog, which you can find at CrenshawComm.com.

Risk Management Magazine and Risk Management Monitor. Copyright 2013 Risk and Insurance Management Society, Inc. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Risk Management Magazine  is the premier source of analysis, insight and news for corporate risk managers. RM strives to explore existing and emerging techniques and concepts that address the needs of those who are tasked with protecting the physical, financial, human and intellectual assets of their companies. As the business world and the world at large change with increasing speed, RM keeps its readers informed about new challenges and solutions....

212-286-9364

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.