May 23, 2012

ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS: COMING SOON TO A PHYSICIAN’S OFFICE NEAR YOU

Lowndes Drosdick Doster Kantor & Reed P.A.

Recent studies estimate that less than one-third of physicians use electronic health records (EHR) for their patients.  However, the federal government believes that the use of EHR by hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers will increase patient safety, improve patient care, and in the long term cut health care costs by minimizing errors in personal health records and increasing productivity and administrative efficiency.  Providing federal funding to help health care providers implement EHR is also seen as a way to stimulate the economy.  Therefore, it should be no surprise that included within the “stimulus bill” that President Obama signed into law in February of 2009, was the Health and Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, commonly known as the HITECH Act, which provides financial incentives for health care providers to use EHR.

The HITECH Act uses a “carrot and stick” approach to encourage health care providers to use EHR.  As the “carrot,” the HITECH Act set aside $17 billion to be used for incentive payments, in the form of enhanced Medicare reimbursements starting in 2011, to physicians and hospitals who demonstrate that they are “meaningful users” of “certified EHR technology.”  However, after 2015 these payments will no longer be available, and the “stick” will be applied in the form of cuts in Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and physicians who are not “meaningful users” of “certified EHR technology.”

For physicians, the increased Medicare reimbursement will be equal to 75% of the allowable charge, and an eligible physician can earn up to a maximum of $44,000 over the five-year payment period that begins in 2011, subject to annual maximum caps starting at $18,000 in the first year and decreasing each year thereafter.  For those physicians who do not meet the HITECH Act’s EHR requirements by 2015, their Medicare reimbursement will be reduced by 1% in 2015, 2% in 2016, 3% in 2017, and 3-5% in 2018 and beyond.

The HITECH Act did not include the certification standards for EHR technology nor a detailed definition of “meaningful use.”  Instead, that act required the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the federal agency that administers the Medicare program, to define “meaningful use” by administrative rule, and it delegated to the Office of National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services the task of developing the detailed standards for EHR certification. 

On January 13, 2010, CMS published a proposed 556-page administrative rule creating three increasingly stringent “stages” of “meaningful use” criteria and establishing the specific criteria for the first of the three stages.  Simultaneously, ONC published an interim administrative rule which sets standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for EHR technology.  The interim rule was effective on February 12, 2010, while CMS’ proposed “meaningful use” rule was subject to 60 days of public comment.  At the end of the comment period CMS had received 2,000 letters commenting on its proposed rule including lengthy comments from the American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association.

The first-stage “meaningful use” criteria will be in effect for 2011, and it sets forth 25 objectives and corresponding measures to enable physicians to demonstrate “meaningful use” of EHR.  For each “meaningful use” objective, CMS proposes a corresponding measure that is a numeral calculation that the physician uses to demonstrate that he or she has met the objective.  For example, one objective is that the physician maintain an active medical allergy list in the EHR, and the measure is that 80% of all unique patients seen by the physician have at least one medication allergy (or the indication of “none” if the patient has no medication allergies) recorded in the patient’s EHR.

Since most physicians will want to receive the additional Medicare reimbursement made possible by the HITECH Act, and very few will want to suffer the Medicare cuts that will apply in 2015, the coming months should see a rapid implementation of HITECH Act qualified EHR by those physicians who are not already EHR users.

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2012. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.