Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Eleventh Circuit Holds that Net Revenue, Not Profits, Should Determine Damages in FTC Deceptive Marketing Case

The US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit recently affirmed a judgment against three individual defendants finding that the district court correctly used net revenue to calculate damages. Defendant-appellants were involved in a mortgage loan scheme in which they solicited financially distressed homeowners and offered them assistance either through loan modifications or bankruptcy. The district court found that the defendant-appellants engaged in deceptive activities relating to the sale and marketing of the mortgage relief and home foreclosure services they offered.

On appeal, the court addressed only the issue of whether the district court abused its discretion in calculating damages by using net revenue. The Eleventh Circuit agreed with defendant-appellants that an award based on consumer losses would be improper, but found that the district court appropriately based the award on the defendant-appellants’ net revenue. In doing so, the Eleventh Circuit rejected defendant-appellants’ argument that profits should have been considered as a basis for the damages award. Agreeing with opinions from the First, Second and Seventh Circuits, the Eleventh Circuit held that a judgment ordering defendants to disgorge only profit (net revenue minus expenses) would inappropriately allow defendants to “deduct costs associated with committing their illegal acts.”

FTC v. Washington Data Resources, Inc., No. 12-13392 (11th Cir. Jan. 16, 2013).

©2014 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

About the Author

Michael M. Rosensaft, Health Care Attorney, Katten Muchin Law Firm
Partner

Michael M. Rosensaft focuses his litigation practice on representing individuals and businesses in white collar criminal matters, regulatory enforcement matters, corporate internal investigations, insurance and health care fraud and complex civil litigation.

212-940-6631

About the Author

Allison Wuertz, Securities Litigation Attorney, Katten Muchin Law firm
Associate

Allison Wuertz concentrates her practice in litigation and dispute resolution matters.

212-940-6675

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.