Advertisement

July 25, 2014

Eleventh Circuit Rejects U.S. Department of Labor's Authority to Issue Rules for H-2B Program

On April 1st, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a landmark decision holding that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) lacks the authority to issue rules in connection with the H-2B program, which permits U.S. employers or U.S. agents who meet specific regulatory requirements to bring foreign nationals to the United States to fill temporary nonagricultural jobs. Greenberg Traurig, LLP represented the U.S. Chamber of Commerce as one of the named plaintiffs in this suit.

The decision rejected the DOL’s argument that it had the implied authority to issue H-2B rules under 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(1) based on the statute’s “in consultation with” language, concluding that “[t]his is an absurd reading of the statute and we decline to adopt it. DHS was given overall responsibility, including rulemaking authority, for the H-2B program. DOL was designated a consultant. It cannot bootstrap that supporting role into a co-equal one.” The Court further denied the DOL’s reliance on 8 U.S.C.(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b), holding that the Congress’ express grant of rulemaking authority to the agency over the H-2A program signaled that it had intentionally declined to extend similar powers with respect to the H-2B rules. The decision also referenced a similar argument in rejecting the DOL’s contention that the “text, structure and object” of the INA afforded the agency rulemaking authority, concluding that “this would be a more appealing argument if Congress had not expressly delegated that authority to a different agency.” Finally, the Court held that concerns about potential delays in rule implementation could not overcome a legal challenge to the agency’s inherently overbroad scheme of rulemaking, stating “[i]f the ‘entire regulatory program’ is ultra vires, then it should be called into question.”

The decision upholds a lower court’s ruling for a preliminary injunction against the implementation of the DOL’s H-2B rules, with a permanent injunction expected in the near future. For a complete copy of the Court’s decision, please click here.

©2014 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Nataliya Binshteyn, Immigration Attorney, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm
Associate

Nataliya Binshteyn focuses her practice on global business immigration matters. Her experience includes representing political asylum applicants in immigration proceedings before Asylum Officers and Immigration Judges. Nataliya has experience conducting client interviews, researching country conditions and applicable laws, and soliciting expert testimony as well as drafting affidavits and immigration documents for filing with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

703-903-7583

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.