Advertisement

April 23, 2014

Employee’s Role in Timekeeping Emphasized in New Sixth Circuit Opinion

A recent court ruling by the Sixth Circuit, which includes Kentucky, has received extensive publicity for its holding relative to employer’s obligations for employee lunch breaks. In White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp., 11-5717 (6th Cir. App. 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the employee “bears some responsibility for the proper implementation of the FLSA’s overtime provisions […] an employee cannot undermine his employer’s efforts to comply with the FLSA by consciously omitting overtime hours for which he knew he could be paid.”[1]

As a result, the burden to maintain accurate records may be shifting more towards the employee. In White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp., an emergency room nurse – Plaintiff White — did not have a regularly scheduled lunch break due to the nature of her job. The Defendant’s employee handbook stated that employees working shifts of six or more hours would receive an unpaid meal break, the time for which would be automatically deducted from their checks. If an employee’s meal break was missed or interrupted because of a work-related reason, the employee would be compensated for the time worked. Each employee was to record all time spent working during his/her breaks in an “exception log.”  In addition, Defendant also had procedures for employees to report errors in payroll for inaccurate wages.

Plaintiff White initially recorded her interrupted meal breaks in the log and was compensated for those breaks. But she did not use the log or the payroll system to report the unpaid periods at issue in her suit. She occasionally told her supervisors she was not getting her meal breaks, but never told her supervisor or the HR department that she was not being paid. She then filed suit claiming she was not compensated as required by the FLSA. The district court granted summary judgment to Defendant and the Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling.

The Court of Appeals held that Defendant did not know or have any reason to know of the occasions Plaintiff White worked through breaks. Per the Court: “When White utilized the system she was compensated and when she failed to use the system she was not compensated.”

It is well established that employers must have a policy and procedure in place to report overtime and unpaid wages. The White decision indicates that the employee’s actions should also be thoroughly examined to evaluate an FLSA claim. Accordingly, the employer’s policies should be well-known to its employees and the procedures should be easy to follow, which may ultimately ease the employer’s burden by ensuring that employees are informed that such compliance is a two-way street.


[1] White v. Baptist Memorial Health Care Corp. at 8.

© 2014 by McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, PLLC. All rights reserved.

About the Author

Brittany Blackburn Koch, McBrayer Law Firm, Litigation Family Attorney
Associate

Brittany Blackburn Koch is a member of the firm's litigation group. Her practice is diverse, with a primary focus on civil litigation and family law. Her civil litigation practice includes the areas of contract disputes, personal injury, and employment law, which consists of representing employers in state and federal trial courts for issues associated with the enforcement of no-compete agreements, the investigation and defense of discrimination claims, and the negotiation and enforcement of severance agreements.

Ms. Koch provides a variety of family law services ranging from...

859-231-8780

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.