Advertisement

July 28, 2014

Employees’ Requested Religious Accommodations Must Be Reasonable

An employee whose religion prohibits or prevents him from performing certain job duties may ask his employer to provide an accommodation. So says Title VII. However, simply because an employee makes a particular request does not mean that the employer must grant it. The request must be reasonable.

This important proviso was recently demonstrated in EEOC v. Thompson Contracting, Grading, Paving & Utilities, No. 11-1897, 2012 WL 6217612 (4th Cir. Dec. 14, 2012).  There, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued a construction contractor on behalf a Hebrew Israelite dump truck driver who had been terminated because he refused to work on his Sabbath. The EEOC suggested that the construction contractor could have accommodated the employee by hiring hourly contract drivers to take his place or by creating a pool of substitute drivers. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed.  Neither of those proposed accommodations were reasonable, it explained, because of the high cost associated with them. It would have cost the construction contractor eight times more per day to use independent contractor drivers, for example, than to use its own inhouse drivers.

Employers should attempt to work with employees who make reasonable requests for religious accommodations – just like they should attempt to work with employees who make reasonable requests for disability accommodations. Just because a request is made, though, does not mean that it is reasonable. And, while rejecting a request to accommodate because of the high costs associated with it can be risky, there are times when doing so is appropriate.  Thompson Contracting makes that much clear.

© 2014 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

James Ehrenberg, Labor and Employment Attorney, Barnes Thornburg law firm
Associate

James F. Ehrenberg is an associate in Barnes & Thornburg’s Labor and Employment Law Department in Indianapolis, Indiana. He regularly defends employers in matters alleging wrongful discharge, discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, unpaid wages, and other employment-related claims. 

Prior to joining Barnes & Thornburg, Mr. Ehrenberg served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Harry Lee Hudspeth, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Following his clerkship...

317-231-6488

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.