February 8, 2012

Employers Now Have Increased Flexibility in Managing Forms I-9 Electronically

The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) adopted an interim rule in 2006 that permitted employers to electronically sign and store I-9 Employment Eligibility Verification Forms. After considering public comments related to this interim rule, DHS recently published a final rule that will afford employers greater flexibility in completing, signing, and storing Forms I-9 electronically. Effective August 23, 2010, the final rule provides the following guidance related to the management of Forms I-9: 

  • Employers must complete a Form I-9 for each employee within three business days (not calendar days) of the date on which employment begins.
  • Employers may use paper, electronic systems, or a combination of paper and electronic systems to complete a Form I-9. Employers are required to retain only those pages of the Form I-9 on which the employer or employee enters data; employers need not retain the Form’s instruction pages.
  • Employers may implement an electronic storage system for the management of Forms I-9, provided that the system includes indexing capabilities that allow for the identification and retrieval of relevant records maintained by the electronic system. Additionally, employers must ensure that they retain existing Forms I-9 in a system that remains fully accessible.
  • Employers are not required to maintain an audit trail that records every instance in which an electronic Form I-9 is simply viewed or accessed. Rather, employers must update a Form I-9’s audit trail only when a Form I-9 is created, completed, updated, modified, altered, or corrected. The audit trail should include the date of access, the identity of the individual who accessed the electronic record, and the particular action taken.
  • Employers may provide confirmation, such as a printed copy of the electronic record, of a Form I-9 transaction to the affected employee, but such confirmation is not required unless the employee requests it. If an employee does request confirmation of a Form I-9 transaction, the employer must provide this confirmation to the employee within a reasonable period of time of the transaction. 

Employers should be aware that, over the last year, DHS has significantly increased its use of I-9 audits as an immigration enforcement measure. This increase in I-9 audits has resulted in large civil penalties, as well as federal criminal charges in some cases, for employers who were found to have violated U.S. immigration laws.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

José A. Olivieri is a partner in the Milwaukee office. He is Chair of the Labor and Employment Relations Practice Group and Co-Chair of the Government and Public Policy Group. He has extensive experience in the area of employment-based immigration matters, including B (temporary visitor), E (treaty trader/investor), F and M (student), H (temporary worker), J (exchange visitor), L (intracompany transferee), O and P (outstanding artist, scientist, educator, businessperson and/or athlete), R (religious worker) and TN (NAFTA) status, as well as permanent labor certification, national...

414-225-4967

About the Author

Partner

Kelly Fortier is a partner in the Employment Relations Practice Group. Her practice includes representation of management in all aspects of employment law, with primary focus on employment-based immigration, including nonimmigrant petitions, permanent residence cases, naturalization applications, and employment verification issues. Her immigration work includes B (temporary visitor), E (treaty trader/investor), F (student), H (temporary worker), J (exchange visitor), L (intracompany transferee), O (extraordinary ability in the sciences, R (religious worker), and TN (NAFTA...

414-277-3460

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.