May 23, 2012

Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation – Blog Series: Motions for Summary Judgment

Summary judgment is a procedural device that allows for the resolution of a controversy without the need for trial. After a lawsuit has been filed, the parties to that lawsuit can file motions for summary judgment, although in some jurisdictions there may be restrictions that regulate the timing for bringing such motions. Summary judgment motions ask the court to enter judgment without a trial because there is no genuine issue of material fact to be decided by a jury (i.e., because the evidence is legally insufficient to support a verdict in the other party’s favor).

The party moving for summary judgment has to show that there are no factual issues that need to be resolved in order for the court to render judgment in its favor. If the moving party meets this initial burden, the burden then shifts to the opposing party to show specific facts demonstrating otherwise. The parties are free to, and often must, file declarations or affidavits and other papers, including discovery documents such as admissions, responses to interrogatories, and deposition transcripts, in support of their positions.

In deciding a summary judgment motion, the court will review the pleadings and any declarations, affidavits and other papers submitted by the parties. The court will only grant summary judgment if, based upon that review, it determines that there is no evidence that would justify a verdict for the party opposing the summary judgment motion. In making this determination, all inferences drawn from the evidence and ambiguities in the facts are resolved in favor of the party who opposes the motion. Although it may appear to be difficult establishing entitlement to summary judgment, it is not impossible.

Motions for summary judgment are routinely filed in litigation proceedings. The primary purpose is to eliminate trial where it is unnecessary and would only cause delay and expense. Trials, and particularly preparation for trial, can often be a major driving force in the cost of litigation. Summary judgment offers a way for parties to avoid those costs and eliminate the risk of trial.

 

Click Below for previous posts from the Entrepreneur’s Guide to Litigation Blog Series:

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Ken Albridge is a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation Group in the Madison office, where the primary focus of his practice is in the area of patent litigation. In addition to intellectual property litigation, Mr. Albridge also has experience in various other litigation related matters, including complex contractual disputes and governmental administrative proceedings. Mr. Albridge is involved in all phases of litigation and trial preparation and has experience preparing briefs and legal memoranda, conducting legal research, working with expert witnesses, handling discovery...

608-257-3067

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.