October 25, 2014

Advertisement

October 24, 2014

October 23, 2014

October 22, 2014

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States"

EPA and the Corps of Engineers (the Agencies) released a pre-publication version of a proposed rule to revise the definition of “waters of the United States.” The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register within the next week, starting a 90-day comment period. The proposed rule replaces the definition of “waters of the United States” and the definition of “navigable waters” as used in 12 sections of the Code of Federal Regulations, affecting nine different regulatory programs. The proposal and additional documents and information can be found at www.epa.gov/uswaters.

Under the proposed rule, all tributaries of navigable waters, interstate waters, and the territorial seas (collectively referred to as Traditional Navigable Waters or TNW) and all waters adjacent to TNW or their tributaries are jurisdictional by rule because there is a presumed significant nexus between such waters and a TNW. The Agencies only need to determine that the water meets the definition of “tributary” or “adjacency.”

For waters that escape the expanded definitions of tributary or adjacency, the Agencies may still find a significant nexus on a case-by-case basis, considering all similarly situated waters located in the same region. The definition of “significant nexus” makes it clear that all waters in the same watershed are in the same region.

On its face, the proposal appears similar to the existing regulatory definition of “waters of the United States.” However, the proposal adds a definition of “tributary” and expands the definition of what water is adjacent. These new definitions significantly expand the universe of water that is jurisdictional by rule. While the Agencies have historically relied upon their best professional judgment to make the significant nexus determination, the proposal will ask for comment on various factors and assumptions to simplify the regulator’s determination. In addition, the proposed rule changes the test for the “other waters” category from one based on impacts to interstate commerce to one based on ecological impacts, expanding what was already a category that courts had determined was overly broad.

While expanding the Agencies’ jurisdictional reach, the proposal also would codify certain exemptions, including the waste treatment system exemption and the prior converted cropland exemption set forth in previous regulations. The rule also would codify policy statements from previous Federal Register preambles. However, given the increased jurisdictional scope of the proposed rule, more waters would become subject to jurisdiction than would be exempted.

Click here to see which waters are excluded and those that not excluded.

© 2014 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Susan Bodine, Environmental Public Policy Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm
Partner

Susan Parker Bodine is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Washington, D.C., office, where she is a member of the firm’s Environmental Law Department.

202-371-6364
Fredric Andes, Environmental Attorney, Barnes Thornburg, Law firm
Partner

Fredric P. Andes is a partner in the Chicago and Washington, D.C. offices of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, an administrator of the Environmental Department and the leader of the firm's water team. Mr. Andes is involved in counseling and litigation on issues arising under various federal and state environmental laws, with a special emphasis on Clean Water Act matters.

Mr. Andes is involved in clean water issues on the national and state levels. He was selected by the EPA to serve on the Federal Advisory Committee on the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program. He is serving as...

312-214-8310
Erika K. Powers, Environmental law attorney, Barnes & Thornburg law firm
Partner

Erika K. Powers is a partner in the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. She is a member of the Environmental Department and concentrates her practice in the area of water quality. Ms. Powers advises municipalities, utility districts, trade organizations, and other regulated parties across the country on a wide variety of Clean Water Act issues, including wet weather management and wastewater treatment. She also assists clients in matters involving water quality standards, the listing and delisting of impaired water bodies, TMDL development and implementation, effluent limitations...

312-338-5904