Advertisement

May 25, 2013

EPA Rejects Confidential Business Information Claims for More than 150 Chemical Names – Posts Information on EPA Website

In another of what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) refers to as a series of “unprecedented actions,” EPA announced it has made public the names of more than 150 chemicals identified in over 100 health and safety studies that had been claimed confidential by submitting companies pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”). TSCA requires chemical manufacturers, importers, processors and distributors to submit reports to EPA after obtaining information that a chemical presents a substantial risk of injury to health or the environment.

According to EPA’s press release, the named chemicals are used in “dispersant formulations and consumer products such as air fresheners, non-stick and stain resistant materials, fire resistant materials, nonylphenol compounds, perfluorinated compounds, and lead.”

In 2010, EPA challenged industry to voluntarily declassify unwarranted claims of confidential business information (“CBI”) and issued new guidance outlining the agency’s plan to deny confidentiality claims for the identity of chemicals in health and safety studies under TSCA. The agency’s May 2010 notice informed industry that Section 14(b) of TSCA “does not extend confidential treatment to health and safety studies, or data from health and safety studies, which, if made public, would not disclose processes used in the manufacturing or processing of a chemical substance or mixture or, in the case of a mixture, the release of data disclosing the portion of the mixture comprised by any of the chemical substances in the mixture.” Fed. Reg., Vol. 75, No. 102, May 27, 2010. Therefore, where a chemical identity does not explicitly contain process information or reveal portions of a mixture, EPA expects the information would not be entitled to confidential treatment. 

As a follow-up to its May 2010 notice, in February 2011, EPA informed a number of companies that their CBI claims were not eligible for confidential treatment under TSCA and the chemical names would be made public. 

EPA’s recent efforts to make chemical information more readily available has included free online access to a consolidated TSCA inventory of chemicals and a new chemical data access tool that provides an electronic database platform to search over 10,000 health and safety documents. Now, EPA has announced that it will be regularly posting new TSCA declassified materials on its website.

Chemical manufacturers, importers, processors and distributors may still claim confidentiality under TSCA for proprietary reasons but must submit more detailed explanations to substantiate all CBI claims. EPA has provided a list of questions that a submitting company should answer to substantiate a CBI claim, available here.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

linda h, bochert, partner, michael best law firm
Partner

As a partner in the firm’s Land and Resources Practice Group, Linda Bochert helps her clients establish and maintain effective working relationships with state and federal environmental regulatory agencies. She serves in various policy advisory roles to state agencies, including the Wisconsin Departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Revenue. Her clients benefit from her unique understanding of the workings of regulatory agencies and her ability to develop mutually beneficial solutions to regulatory issues. Ms. Bochert also co-chairs our firmwide Sustainability Initiative.

608-283-2271

About the Author

Leah Hurtgen Ziemba Associate Michael Best and Friedrich
Associate

Leah Hurtgen Ziemba is an associate in the Madison office of Michael Best and a member of the Energy and Sustainability Industry Group and Agribusiness, Food Processing and Distribution Group.

608-283-4420

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.