July 22, 2014

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Seeks Comments on Quality Control Plan for Investigations and Conciliations

Last Friday, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that it was seeking public comment of its draft principles for the Quality Control Plan (Plan) which will revise the criteria for measuring the quality of the agency’s investigations and conciliations. The Plan was developed by an internal work group of EEOC front-line staff and managers, and addresses the issues of timeliness and quality.

The EEOC stated the standard of review in assessing the quality of investigations and conciliations, nationally, will be “whether the actions taken were reasonable given the totality of circumstances, including available resources.” The Plan will not measure specific performance of any one staff person and, instead, that would be reserved for the performance review process. The EEOC also explained that the level of investigatory resources given to each Charge will be dependent upon its categorization under the Priority Charge Handling Procedures (PCHP) and overall resources available.

According to the EEOC, the Plan defines a “quality investigation” as the EEOC performing the following:

  1. Identify the bases, issues, and relevant allegations of the alleged unlawful employment action in a Charge.
  2. Conduct an investigation consistent with its PCHP.
  3. Apply the law to the facts to determine if there is reasonable cause to believe that unlawful employment discrimination has occurred.
  4. Communicate with the Charging Party and the Respondent (or with their lawyers, if represented) to obtain sufficient information to make its determination.

The Plan defines “quality conciliation” as one in which the EEOC conducts the following:

  1. Seeks targeted, equitable relief.
  2. Informs the parties of the proposed categories of relief and how monetary terms were reached.
  3. Responds appropriately to reasonable offers made by the parties.

Comments to the draft Plan can be submitted to the EEOC through 5:00 p.m. EST, May 24, 2013, at or via mail at Executive Officer, Office of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20507.


About the Author

Tina A. Syring Labor and Employment Law attorney

Tina A. Syring is a partner in Barnes & Thornburg LLP’s Minneapolis office and a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law Department.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.