July 27, 2014

European Parliament Approves EU Unitary Patent Rules

Since the early 1970s, several different governing instances of the European Community have tried to implement a true unitary patent system, referred to as a Community Patent Convention (CPC) patent. Under this unitary system, much like in the United States, a single patent application is filed and, once approved, becomes enforceable in all the Member States.

Unable to reach this level of cohesion, the alternative has been to use the Convention on the Grant of European Patents, commonly known as the European Patent Convention (EPC). Under the EPC, a single patent application is filed, prosecuted and allowed, but it only serves to create a group of essentially independent, nationally enforceable, nationally revocable patents that are subject to central revocation.

An EPC application is filed before the European Patent Office in any one of the official languages of member countries. At some point, once the European patent is granted in a single proceeding, the applicant designates those contracting states in which protection is desired and must incur the cost of translation of the application into the language of each of the designated states. These independent national designations are later “confirmed” during a subsequent step of limited prosecution by each state. Ultimately, multiple patents issue in multiple languages. The step of national designation is made even more complex if the European patent is filed from an initial application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT).

On December 11, 2012, the European Parliament approved the necessary European Union legislation to finally create the unitary European Union Patent (EU patent, EC patent or COMPAT patent) with a true unitary effect. The entry into force, after 13 state ratifications, is planned, at the earliest, on January 1, 2014. We expect the EU patent to come into force between 2015 and 2017.

The EU patent no longer requires state designation and will be valid in all the Member States. A common patent court called the Unified Patent Court (UPC) will be constituted and will have exclusive jurisdiction over infringement and revocation proceedings.

Currently the cost of obtaining an EPC patent in all 27 EU countries is approximately $42,900, mainly due to translation costs. The cost of the CPC patent in the same 27 EU countries will be closer to $10,000, a significant savings in cost. Further, there will be no need for individual management of each patent or for individual payment of renewal fees. We expect prosecution of the CPC to be relatively similar to the prosecution of the EPC.

© 2014 Vedder Price

About the Author

Alain Villeneuve, Vedder Price Law Firm, Intellectual Property Attorney

Alain Villeneuve joined Vedder Price as an associate in the firm's Intellectual Property Group in 2006.  He represents clients in a wide range of intellectual property matters including the prosecution of patents and the registration and monitoring of trademarks and copyrights. His experience includes drafting patent applications in electrical, mechanical, wireless and computer software fields.  He has also filed for International Patent and Trademark applications under the PCT and Madrid regimes.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.