Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Expert Who Admittedly Failed to Follow 921 Employed Reliable Methodology

An appliance manufacturer challenged the admissibility of an origin and cause expert’s testimony arguing that (1) the origin and cause expert’s failure to employ NFPA 921 automatically subjects the opinion to exclusion and (2) his methodology was unreliable.  The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals used this opportunity to summarize its 921 caselaw.  “NFPA 921 qualifies as "a reliable method endorsed by a professional organization, but we have not held NFPA 921 is the only reliable way to investigate a fire. Our NFPA 921 cases stand for the simple proposition an expert who purports to follow NFPA 921 must apply its contents reliably.”  (Citations omitted). 

An expert’s “testimony can only be excluded on NFPA 921 grounds if he purported to follow NFPA 921 but did not reliably apply it to the remains of the fire.”   The expert admittedly did not follow NFPA 921.  He testified NFPA 921 cannot be used when a fire leaves an insufficient burn pattern on the structure that sustained the fire. He did not employ NFPA 921 because, given the extent of the destruction, he believed he could not apply the guideline. Because the expert “did not attempt to employ NFPA 921 in his investigation, and therefore, his testimony may not be excluded for failure to reliably apply its contents.” 

Defendant argued that the expert’s methodology was not scientifically reliable because the expert “simply eyeballed three appliances he identified in the debris and concluded the most severely burned was the area of origin.”  The court held that the expert’s methodology was sufficient and that Defendant’s arguments went to the weight of the testimony, not its admissibility.  Russell v. Whirlpool, No. 12-1451, was issued on December 17, 2012. 

© Copyright 2014 Armstrong Teasdale LLP. All rights reserved

About the Author

Gerald A. King, Explosion, fire, Electrocution litigation, attorney, Armstrong
Partner

Jerry King practices in all aspects of explosion, fire, and electrocution litigation, including products liability, class actions, trials, and appeals. As a Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator (CFEI), as certified by the National Certification Board of the National Association of Fire Investigators and recognized by National Fire Protection Association 921 Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, Jerry’s knowledge and experience allows him to provide effective and efficient solutions to resolve even the most complex case. An authority on these issues, he is often sought...

816-472-3126

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals.&nb