Advertisement

May 19, 2013

Expiration of Grandfather Protection for Technical Component Services Billing Is Looming

One month from today, the law that permits independent laboratories to bill and receive payment from Medicare Part B for the technical component of certain anatomic pathology, cytopathology, and surgical pathology services (“TC Services”) provided to patients of “covered hospitals” will expire.   

Medicare pays hospitals a per-discharge amount for inpatient services pursuant to the inpatient prospective payment system.  Similarly, outpatient services are reimbursed on a per-procedure basis under the outpatient prospective payment system.  For both inpatients and outpatients, the payment received includes most services provided to the patient.

Payments for inpatient services include all clinical laboratory services as well as TC Services.  Clinical laboratory services and TC Services provided to outpatients are separately billable, but the hospital, rather than the independent laboratory, must submit claims for those services to Medicare.  

In 2000, Congress enacted the Grandfather Clause to prevent the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from ceasing to pay independent laboratories separately for TC Services furnished to patients of hospitals who had an agreement with an independent laboratory for the provision of those services as of July 22, 1999 (referred to as “covered hospitals” in the statute).  The original legislation applied to services furnished to a covered hospital through 2002, but Congress has since extended the provision many times.  The current extension runs through July 1, 2012, but Congress is not expected to grant additional extensions due to concerns about Medicare paying twice for the same services and about CMS’s ability to determine with certainty which hospitals qualify as “covered hospitals.”   In addition, eliminating the protection would reportedly save $50 million per year.

Although the American Clinical Laboratory Association, the College of American Pathologists, and others continue their lobbying efforts, chances for an additional extension appear bleak.  Covered hospitals and the independent laboratories with which they do business should therefore begin to prepare for this substantial change in their business relationship.  Independent laboratories will have no choice but to look to those hospitals previously covered by the Grandfather Clause for payment for TC Services provided to their patients becuase the laboratories can no longer bill Medicare.

©1994-2013 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Member

Karen is the Practice Leader of the firm’s Health Law Section.

202-4347324

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.