Advertisement

April 16, 2014

Facebook Status: You’re Fired

The facts may change but the story remains the same.  Employee posts derogatory statements on Facebook.  Employee gets fired.

The most recent example of this occurred in Paterson, New Jersey and involved a first grade teacher.  The teacher posted the following status updates on her Facebook page:

  • I’m not a teacher – I’m a warden for future criminals!
  • They had a scared straight program in school – why couldn’t [I] bring [first] graders?

Viewers of these posts included one of the teacher’s colleagues, who forwarded the posts to her school principal.  The teacher was immediately suspended with pay pending further investigation.  As news leaked regarding her comments, the school received a least a dozen irate phone calls, a protest of 20-25 persons took place outside the school and camera crews from major news organizations descended upon the school.

Tenure charges were then brought against the teacher by the school district.  The teacher argued that her statements were protected by the First Amendment.  The Administrative Law Judge (”ALJ”) assigned to the case rejected this defense.  He noted that her remarks were not a matter of public concern, but rather, merely an expression of dissatisfaction with her job.  The ALJ found that comments, such as those made by the teacher, make it “impossible for parents to cooperate with or have faith in a teacher who insults their children and trivializes legitimate education concerns on the internet.”

The teacher pointed to her spotless employment record as well as her almost thirteen years of service and argued that termination was inappropriate for a mere “momentary lapse in judgment.”  Again the ALJ disagreed.  He found her comments “showed a disturbing lack of self-restraint, violated any notion of good behavior and [acted in a matter that was] inimical to her roles as a professional educator.”  The ALJ’s decision appears to have been based, in large part, on the teacher’s response to the charges.  The ALJ noted that he had expected the teacher to be contrite and express regret over her actions.  Instead, she merely appeared “befuddled by the commotion she had created” and continued to deny that her conduct was inappropriate.  Finding that her actions were grossly inappropriate and her relationship with the Paterson school community “irreparably damaged,” the ALJ concluded the teacher was unfit to continue her duties and dismissed her from her teaching position.  The ALJ opinion was then upheld by the New Jersey Appellate Division for the reasons expressed in the ALJ opinion.

© 2014 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Ari G. Burd, Giordano Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney
Associate

Mr. Burd practices in both the Labor and Employment Law Practice Area and the Health Care Practice Area. In the Labor and Employment Practice Area, Mr. Burd devotes his time to litigation and counseling employers with regard to traditional employment and labor related issues. Mr. Burd has extensive experience in both the state and federal courts in areas including retaliation, wrongful termination, wage and hour, sexual harassment and race, age, gender and disability discrimination. Mr. Burd also has considerable experience in assisting negotiating and drafting employment related...

732-741-3900

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.