Advertisement

May 19, 2013

FDA Issues Draft Guidance on Pre-Submission Meetings for Medical Device Marketing Approval

The FDA recently issued a draft Guidance document titled "Medical Devices: Pre-Submission Program and Meetings with FDA Staff" (the "Guidance") to provide advice to medical device manufacturers who want FDA's input before submitting an IDE, HDE, 510(k), or PMA. The Guidance notes that it arises out of, and broadens, the former pre-IDE meeting program to cover the other stated types of applications or notification and also to extend the program to CBER (in addition to CDRH). In light of the increased scope, FDA is changing the name of the program from Pre-IDE to Pre-Submission or Pre-Sub.

According to the Guidance, "the main purpose of the Pre-Sub" program" is "to provide the opportunity for an applicant to obtain FDA feedback prior to intended submission of an IDE or marketing application." The FDA states that it "intends to provide the best possible advice in accordance with the information provided" and to "ensure it is captured accurately in the meeting minutes drafted by the" applicant. Most importantly, however, FDA will "commit to that advice unless the circumstances sufficiently change such that our advice is no longer applicable, such as when a sponsor changes the intended use of their device after we provide feedback" (emphasis added).

The Guidance provides several examples of when a medical device manufacturer might want to request a Pre-Submission meeting. For example, an applicant may want such a meeting before conducting an important study, or submitting an IDE or marketing application, where the new device involves novel technology or is an IVD device that involves a new intended use, new analyte, or new clinical questions. The Guidance provides several other examples as well.   

The Guidance stresses that the Pre-Sub program is designed to answer specific questions an applicant may have before it undertakes some important step in the development process for a device. In contrast, the Guidance states that the program is NOT intended to be, among other things, purely informational or an opportunity for (1) a preview or re-review of data,  (2) obtaining general information, including about FDA policies or procedures, (3) clarifying technical guidance documents, or (4) interactions during the actual review of a marketing application.

The Guidance contains a section on the information that should be included in a Pre-Sub package, including the following:

  • A cover letter clearly stating the reason for the submission in the reference line, e.g., Pre-Sub for 510(k)
  • A Table of Contents showing items and page numbers
  • A device description
  • Propose intended use or indications for use
  • A summary of any prior discussions or submissions
  • A summary of the product development process to date
  • The specific questions the applicant wants FDA to answer
  • The preferred means for obtaining FDA's feedback (e.g., in-person meeting or teleconference)
  • Other logistical information, e.g., for an IDE exempt device of ex-US study, the entire protocol

For several of these components, the Guidance gives further instructions or examples to identify the information that should be included.

The Guidance also includes some discussion on different types of meetings between FDA and industry, including informational, Pre-Sub, and submission issue meetings, and some details on how they are actually conducted and memorialized. As noted above, the Appendix includes several sections devoted to fairly specific instructions, including proposed questions, for each type of Pre-Submission meeting including IDE, NSR (non-significant risk), Exempt, or ex-US study, 510(k), PMA, HDE and IVD.

The complete text of the draft Guidance can be found here.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

Lynn C. Tyler is a partner and registered patent lawyer in the firm’s Intellectual Property Department. Mr. Tyler helps innovative companies secure and preserve their market position and competitive advantage by navigating their way through the FDA to the marketplace and enforcing their intellectual property rights, which often must be protected against imitators who seek to reap where they have not sown. He litigates intellectual property matters and represents clients at virtually all stages of the process, including pre-litigation counseling, alternative dispute resolution,...

317-231-7392

About the Author

Of Counsel

Hae Park-Suk is of counsel in the Washington, D.C., office and a member of the Intellectual Property Department. Ms. Park-Suk counsels clients on the selection, adoption, availability, and proper use of trademarks. Her practice consists of searching and clearing trademarks, prosecuting domestic and international trademark applications, managing extensive foreign trademark portfolios, assisting clients in planning and structuring their worldwide trademark strategies, assisting clients in protecting and enforcing their trademarks in the U.S. and worldwide, coordinating intellectual...

202-408-6919

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.