Advertisement

May 21, 2013

FDA Issues Proposed Rule on Unique Medical Device Identification

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently released a proposed rule that, beginning one year after it becomes final, will require most medical devices distributed in the United States to carry a unique device identifier (UDI). In the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, Congress directed the FDA to develop regulations establishing such a system for medical devices.

Under the proposed rule, a UDI is a unique numeric or alphanumeric code that includes a device identifier and a production identifier. The device identifier is specific to a labeler (typically, the manufacturer) and device model. The production identifier includes the current production information for that specific device, such as the lot or batch number, the serial number and/or expiration date.

The proposed rule requires the label of medical devices and device packages to include a UDI, with certain exceptions for alternative placement of the UDI and for particular devices or device types. Each UDI would have to be provided in a plain-text version and in a form that uses bar code, RFID, or similar technology. The UDI would also be required to be directly marked on the device itself for certain categories of devices, such as implantable devices.

As part of the proposal, the FDA intends to create a database that will include a standard set of basic identifying elements for each UDI and to make most of the database available to the public so that users of a medical device can easily look up information about the device. Neither the UDI nor the FDA’s database will contain any information about who uses a device, including personal privacy information.

The FDA touts several potential benefits for the system once it is fully implemented, including:

  • To allow more accurate reporting, reviewing, and analyzing of adverse event reports.
  • To reduce medical errors by enabling health care professionals to more rapidly and precisely identify a device and obtain important information concerning the characteristics of the device.
  • To enhance FDA’s analysis of devices on the market by providing a standard way to document device use in electronic health records, clinical information systems, claim data sources, and registries.
  • To provide a standardized identifier that will allow manufacturers, distributors and healthcare facilities to more effectively manage medical device recalls.
  • To secure the distribution chain, helping to address counterfeiting and diversion.

The proposed rule is subject to public comment for 120 days, after which FDA will review the comments and adopt a final rule. Any final rule would become effective in stages, over a period of seven years. One year after publication of the final rule, the label and package for class III medical devices must bear a UDI. Class II device labels follow two years later, and class I and unclassified devices follow two more years after class II. For devices that must be marked, the start date for class III devices is three years after publication of the final rule, with class II following two years later and class I and unclassified devices following two more years later.

The FDA’s explanation of the proposed rule and its text can be found here.

© 2013 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Of Counsel

Hae Park-Suk is of counsel in the Washington, D.C., office and a member of the Intellectual Property Department. Ms. Park-Suk counsels clients on the selection, adoption, availability, and proper use of trademarks. Her practice consists of searching and clearing trademarks, prosecuting domestic and international trademark applications, managing extensive foreign trademark portfolios, assisting clients in planning and structuring their worldwide trademark strategies, assisting clients in protecting and enforcing their trademarks in the U.S. and worldwide, coordinating intellectual...

202-408-6919

About the Author

Partner

Lynn C. Tyler is a partner and registered patent lawyer in the firm’s Intellectual Property Department. Mr. Tyler helps innovative companies secure and preserve their market position and competitive advantage by navigating their way through the FDA to the marketplace and enforcing their intellectual property rights, which often must be protected against imitators who seek to reap where they have not sown. He litigates intellectual property matters and represents clients at virtually all stages of the process, including pre-litigation counseling, alternative dispute resolution,...

317-231-7392

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.