Advertisement

April 24, 2014

Federal Agencies Propose Three Important Health Care Reform Regulations

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Department of Labor (DOL), and the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) recently released two proposed rules and  a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) addressing some of the most fundamental reforms of the Affordable Care Act (ACA): essential health benefits, health insurance market reforms, and wellness program incentives.

Health Insurance Market Reforms

The reforms addressed in this widely anticipated rule include:

  • Guaranteed availability and renewability.  This rule requires insurers in the individual and small group markets to accept all applicants, regardless of health status or other factors.
  • Fair health insurance premiums and rating reforms. These reforms restrict an insurer’s ability to vary premiums based on individual characteristics.  Individual premiums may only be varied based on four characteristics—geographic area, age, smoking/non-smoking status, and family size.  For each of these characteristics, the rule outlines a standardized  methodology that insurers must use in calculating premium variations.
  • Single risk pool.  In determining rates, health insurers are required to consider all enrollees in a state’s individual market as part of a single risk pool.
  • Catastrophic plans.  The ACA allows issuers to offer catastrophic plans—which are required to meet some but not all of the ACA’s requirements—to individuals under age 30 or individuals who cannot afford other coverage.
  • Amendments to the rate review process.  The proposed rule also amends previous rules regarding the process by which states and the federal government will review premium increases.  CCIIO also released a proposed template by which insurers will submit rate increases for review.

CMS also released technical fact sheets describing the market reforms and the changes to rate review in more detail.

Essential Health Benefits

The ACA requires that all health insurance plans in the individual and small group markets cover a certain set of benefits—“essential health benefits.”  The proposed rule builds on an approach outlined in a December 2011 bulletin under which each state selects a plan currently offered in that state to use as a “base benchmark” for essential health benefits.  The rule expands on the bulletin, describing in more detail how states can add additional benefit requirements to supplement the benchmark benefits and how a “default” benchmark will be assigned if a state fails to choose a benchmark plan.  In conjunction with the rule, CMS also released additional information about the proposed benchmark plans in each state.

The rule also describes how a plan’s “actuarial value”—an estimate of the percent of enrollees’ health care costs that are covered by the plan after cost sharing—will be calculated.  In addition, CMS released an actuarial value calculator and a description of the actuarial value calculator methodology.

Finally, the rule discusses the process by which health insurance issuers become accredited to participate in health insurance exchanges.  The rule recognizes the National Committee for Quality Assurance as the initial accrediting agencies.

In coordination with the rule, CMS also sent a letter to state Medicaid directors providing guidance on the essential health benefits that must be provided to newly eligible Medicaid beneficiaries.

Wellness Program Incentives

The NPRM issued jointly by DOL, Treasury, and HHS deals with wellness incentive programs offered by employer health plans.  Existing law imposes standards on employer wellness programs in order to prevent discrimination based on health status.  The proposed rule amends these standards.

Although these are the highlights, the proposed rules and NPRM contain significant guidance relating to other aspects of the ACA’s reforms.  We will be providing more detailed analysis on the implications of these effects of these proposals on insurers, providers, and beneficiaries in the coming weeks.

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.