Advertisement

June 18, 2013

Federal Appeals Court Enjoins Implementation of NLRB’s Private Sector Posting Rule

On April 17, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit enjoined the National Labor Relations Board (”NLRB”) from implementing its controversial rule requiring most private employers to post a notice of employee rights under the National Labor Relations Act (”NLRA”). As we have noted in prior Labor & Employment Updates, the rule was to become effective April 30.

In early March, a federal district court in the District of Columbia generally upheld the NLRB’s authority to promulgate and implement the notice-posting rule, although the court did strike down portions of the rule dealing with penalties and statutes of limitations. Various business groups appealed this decision to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

On Friday, April 13, 2012, in another lawsuit challenging the NLRB’s right to implement the rule, Judge David C. Norton of the District Court of South Carolina ruled that NLRB lacked the statutory authority to require the posting. He held that the NLRB’s rule-making power is limited to those rules that are necessary to carry out NLRB’s primary functions (conducting elections and investigating and processing unfair labor practice proceedings). Judge Norton also noted that contrary to other federal employment statutes, nothing in the NLRA requires employers to post notices of employee rights.

In enjoining implementation of the rule, the court of appeals cited the uncertainty about enforcement of the rule as a result of the conflicting district court holdings and the pending appeal, and held that the status quo should be maintained until these issues are resolved. The court set a briefing schedule and has indicated that oral argument will be set for a date in September of this year.

Although it will be some time before these legal issues are ultimately resolved, for the time being at least, employers will not be required to comply with the notice-posting rule. We will watch all of these cases closely and keep you updated on developments.

© 2013 Schiff Hardin LLP

About the Author

Partner

Matthew D. Lahey represents management in a wide range of employment and traditional labor matters. He has conducted federal and state court litigation and has participated in proceedings and hearings before:

  • The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
  • The U.S. Department of Labor
  • The Illinois Department of Labor
  • The Illinois Department of Human Rights
  • The Illinois Human Rights Commission
  • State unemployment compensation tribunals

He also has participated in National Labor Relations Board...

312.258.5674

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.