Advertisement

July 24, 2014

Federal Communications Commission Expands Availability of 400 Million Dollar Rural Health Care Support Mechanism

Executive Summary:  The Federal Communications Commission has released an Order significantly expanding access to $400 million in funds available to health care providers for more accessible and affordable broadband services.

The Federal Communications Commission has released an Order that makes available $400 million annually to qualified health care providers (“HCPs”) to pay for 65% of the cost of “any advanced telecommunications or information service that enables HCPs to post their own data, interact with stored data, generate new data, or communicate, by providing connectivity over private dedicated networks or the public Internet for the provision of health information technology.”

The fund previously was only available to a limited number of rural HCPs. Now consortia composed of both rural and non rural health care providers will be able to receive 65% of their cost of using broadband facilities for health care purposes. The FCC hopes to encourage the growth or formation of state-wide, regional, and Tribal broadband networks in order to access patient records, involve distant specialists, increase the speed and efficiency of medical treatment and lower health care costs.

The program will support the cost of (1) broadband and other advanced services; (2) upgrading existing facilities to higher bandwidth; (3) equipment necessary to create networks of HCPs, as well as equipment necessary to receive broadband services; and (4) HCP-owned infrastructure where shown to be the most cost-effective option. The hybrid approach of the Healthcare Connect Fund provides flexibility for HCPs to create broadband networks that best meet their needs and that can most readily be put to use for innovative and effective tele-health applications. However, it will require that program participants demonstrate that they have chosen the most cost-efficient option through a competitive bidding process. Although the new program replaces the current Internet Access Program, it will provide continuing support for Pilot Program consortia as they exhaust any remaining funding already committed under the Pilot Program.

A consortium is eligible for funding if it is composed of qualified rural and non-rural HCPs and the majority of the members are rural HCPs. Both the rural and non-rural HCPs can receive funding, although funding for non-rural HCPs with more than 400 beds is capped at $30,000 per year for recurring charges and $70,000 for non-recurring charges over a five-year period.

Eligible entities include:

  • Post Secondary institutions offering health care instruction, including teaching hospitals or medical schools;
  • Community health centers or health centers providing health care to migrants;
  • Local health departments or agencies;
  • Community mental health centers;
  • Not-for-profit hospitals;
  • Rural healthcare clinics; and
  • Consortia of health care providers

For-profit entities are not eligible for support, but they can be part of a qualified consortium if the for-profit entity pays its far share.

One of the reasons that the Rural Health Care program was expanded was because during the prior operation of the program funding never approached the 400 million dollars available annually. The program adopted pursuant to the Order provides an excellent opportunity for rural, non-rural, and even for-profit HCPs to form consortia that will reduce the cost of using broadband facilities for health care purposes. The Order also provides an excellent opportunity for providers of broadband services to expand the reach of their facilities to interconnect rural and non-rural HCPs.

Copyright © 2014 Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Mark J Palchick, Wombe Carlyle Law Firm, Communications Attorney
Attorney

Mr. Palchick has been an attorney in the communications field since 1975. He is experienced in matters relating to international copyright, negotiations for the renewal of cable television franchises, submarine landing licenses, E-rate funding, interconnection agreements between private carriers and other FCC regulatory matters.

202-857-4411

About the Author

Rebecca E Jacobs. Womble Carlyle Law Firm, Litigation Attorney
Attorney

Rebecca’s practice focuses on various regulatory and litigation related issues within the communications field. She advises clients on disputes before the Federal Communications Commission and before both federal and state courts.

202-857-4547

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.