September 29, 2014
September 28, 2014
September 27, 2014
Federal Court Enjoins the Application of the Contraceptive Mandate to Company Owned By the Founder of Domino’s Pizza
On March 14, 2013, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan issued a preliminary injunction against the application of the contraceptive mandate under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to a for-profit employer. District Court Judge Lawrence Zatkoff ruled that Domino’s Farm Corp., a for-profit property management company owned by Tom Monaghan, the founder of Domino’s Pizza, did not have to comply with the contraceptive mandate because it violated Monaghan’s religious beliefs. Judge Zatkoff wrote, “It is in the best interest of the public that Monaghan not be compelled to act in conflict with his religious beliefs.” Back in December 2012, Judge Zatoff had issued a temporary restraining order against the application of the contraceptive mandate to Domino’s Farms Corp. This preliminary injunction will enjoin the application of the law to Domino’s Farms Corp. unless the case is appealed.
Currently, there are more than 40 pending legal challenges to the contraceptive mandate. The key issue in these cases is extent to which for-profit employers have a right to religious freedom. The federal courts across the country are addressing this issue and coming to different conclusions.It seems that this issue will remain controversial until the Supreme Court definitively addresses it.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- Supreme Court Applies Tougher “But For” Standard to Title VII Retaliation Claims
- Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) Collective Action: Supreme Court Holds Offer of Judgment Moots Claim
- Supreme Court Denies a Request to Temporarily Enjoin the Contraceptive Mandate
- Second Federal Court Temporarily Enjoins Application of Contraceptive Mandate to a For-Profit Business
- Sixth Circuit Joins Seventh Circuit in Holding that Pre-2008 ADA Cases Requires “But-for” Showing of Discrimination
- Federal and State Guidance on Health Information Privacy and Same-Sex Marriage: HIPAA Privacy Rule Extends to Same-Sex Spouses