September 01, 2014
August 31, 2014
August 30, 2014
Federal Court Rules Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Does Not Have Authority to Fine Trader for Manipulation of Futures Contracts
Pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fined a natural gas trader $30 million for manipulating the settlement price for natural gas futures contracts on the New York Mercantile Exchange by selling a significant number of contracts in a manner designed to affect the settlement price for those contracts. According to the trader, the FERC could not fine him because the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has exclusive jurisdiction over all transactions involving commodity futures contracts. The trader petitioned the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review; the CFTC intervened in support of the trader. The court found that Congress intended Section 2(a)(1)(A) of the Commodity Exchange Act to give the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over transactions conducted on futures markets. The court granted the trader’s petition for review, finding that manipulation of natural gas futures contracts falls within the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction and that nothing in the Energy Policy Act clearly repeals the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. Hunter v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 11-1477 (March 15, 2013).
Click here for the opinion.
<span class="advertise"> Advertisement </span>
- The North Carolina Supreme Court: Metrics for 2013
- Argentina's Financial Fate Now Depends on the U.S. Supreme Court
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Orders $435 Million Civil Penalty to Barclays Bank and $1-15 Million to Four Traders
- D.C. District Court Vacates SEC’s Resource Extraction Issuer Rule
- Any Port in a Storm: Safe Harbor for Financial Institution Intermediaries in the Second Circuit
- Private Equity Fund Is Not a “Trade or Business” Under ERISA