May 23, 2012

Federal Government Contractors Beware: Certain Employment Relations Costs Now Unallowable

Background

In the weeks following President Barack Obama's inauguration, he issued a number of Executive Orders generally viewed by commentators as dramatically shifting U.S. labor policy in favor of unions and union organizing.federal government contracting departments and agencies to treat as unallowable the costs of any activities undertaken to persuade employees, whether employees of the recipient of federal funds or any other entity, to exercise or not exercise, or concerning the manner of exercising, the right to organize and bargain collectively. The stated purpose of the Executive Order was to promote economy and efficiency in government contracting, "...consistent with the policy of the United States to remain impartial concerning any labor-management dispute involving government contractors.

Examples of unallowable costs undertaken to "persuade" employees were listed as:

(a)               preparing and distributing materials;

(b)               hiring or consulting legal counsel or consultants;

(c)               holding meetings (including paying the salaries of the attendees at a meeting held for this purpose); and

(d)               planning or conducting activities by managers, supervisors, or union representatives during work hours.

The Executive Order became effective immediately, and directed the adoption of rules and regulations to carry out the directives of the Executive Order, to apply to contracts resulting from solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the rules.

Amended Federal Acquisition Rules Effective December 2, 2011  

The Department of Defense, General Services Administration and NASA published proposed rules pursuant to the direction contained in the Executive Order and, on November 2, 2011, published a final rule (76 Federal Register 68040), to be effective December 2, 2011, to apply to federal contracts resulting from solicitations issued on or after the effective date, whereby the contractor's costs relating to "persuader activities" of the type set forth in the Executive Order were now unallowable. Costs incurred for maintaining satisfactory labor relations, including those arising from activities such as the costs of shop stewards, Labor-Management Committees, employee publications, and negotiating or administrating collective bargaining agreements remain allowable. Interestingly, costs related to the development, implementation and enforcement of neutrality agreements, which aid unions in their organizing efforts, are also allowable.

Impact on Contractors

Existing Federal Acquisition Regulations require contractors to have an accounting system which segregates allowable from unallowable costs. Care should be taken to properly allocate costs accordingly. 

In addition, contractors should carefully monitor other administration and agency rulemaking efforts, particularly such as the pending Department of Labor proposed rule which would significantly increase the scope of "persuader" activities and narrow the "advice" exception. A final rule along these lines, which most anticipate will be issued in the near future, would not only greatly increase the reporting responsibilities of employers and their advisors, but also, increase the scope of unallowable costs under federal contracts. The attorneys at Michael Best will keep you advised of developments as they occur, and are available to answer your questions or discuss compliance concerns as well.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Tom Obenberger has served as the firm’s Managing Partner, as a member of its Management Committee, and as Chair of its Labor and Employment Practice Group.  Following graduation from Marquette University Law School, where he was an editor of the Marquette Law Review, he served as law clerk to the late Chief Justice E. Harold Hallows of the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Mr. Obenberger has significant experience representing Fortune 500 and other national corporations in all aspects of labor, employment, safety and discrimination law, including general counseling,...

414-225-4960

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.