Advertisement

June 19, 2013

Federal Judge with Medical Industry Investments Rules Against Health Care Law

U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson, who ruled Monday that the health care reform law is unconstitutional, holds financial investments in health and medicine worth as much as $75,000.

In his 78-page opinion, Vinson said the section of the health care law that requires Americans to obtain health insurance exceeds the regulatory powers granted to Congress.

A Center for Public Integrity review of Vinson’s 2009 financial disclosure forms reveals that he has several financial investments in health care industries. They include:

  • Geovax Laboratories, a biotech company specializing in vaccine research.
  • Matrixx Laboratories, an over-the-counter health care company and maker of Zicam.
  • Myriad Genetics, which specializes in advanced genetic testing for cancer.
  • Watson, a pharmaceutical company with over $3 billion in revenue.
  • HCP, which invests in real estate serving the health care industry.

Each of the five investments is worth $15,000 or less, according to the broad financial categories required by the financial disclosure form.

In December, the Center for Public Integrity found that three other judges presiding over health care reform lawsuits had financial investments in the medical industry. Vinson and Judge Henry Hudson of Virginia are the two judges to rule against the health care law. Both were appointed by Ronald Reagan. Two other judges, appointed by Bill Clinton, have upheld the health care reform law. Other challenges are pending.

In his ruling, Vinson, based in Florida, wrote, “Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire act must be declared void. This has been a difficult decision to reach, and I am aware that it will have indeterminable implications. At a time when there is virtually unanimous agreement that health care reform is needed in this country, it is hard to invalidate and strike down a statute titled ‘The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.’ ”

UPDATE — 2/1/2011: Through a court employee, Vinson declined to comment.

Reprinted by Permission © 2013, The Center for Public Integrity®. All Rights Reserved.

About the Author

Laurel Adams graduated cum laude from the University of Delaware in May of 2010 with majors in international relations, Spanish, and Latin American studies. She interned at Voices Without Borders in Wilmington, Del., and the British Embassy in Washington, D.C. While at the University of Delaware, Adams studied abroad in Argentina, helped start a Spanish conversation club, and served as an editor for the Sigma Iota Rho Journal of International Relations.

202-466-1300

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.