Advertisement

May 23, 2013

FERC Issues Long-Awaited Proposal To Replace Current Electric Quarterly Reporting Filing Process

At its June 21st Open Meeting, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) announcing its intention to create a new filing system for its Electric Quarterly Reports (EQRs).  EQRs are used by FERC to satisfy the Federal Power Act requirement for rates to be on file.  FERC currently requires EQR filers to submit data through Visual FoxPro, a Microsoft-supported software.  Microsoft has announced it will stop supporting Visual FoxPro in 2015.  FERC in the NOPR proposed two new filing options in lieu of the current system.   FERC has proposed that implementation of any changes to the EQR process begin with submission of data for the third quarter of 2013.  FERC solicited comments on the NOPR, which will be due within 60 days from the date the NOPR is published in the Federal Register. 

Visual FoxPro currently allows EQR filers to enter data manually or by importing the data in comma-delimited text files.  In order to “minimize the changes for an EQR filer and streamline the filing process by eliminating the need for filers to enter or import the data into a software application,” the first option proposed by FERC would allow EQR filers to continue submitting data in a comma-delimited text format but through a web interface on ferc.gov, rather than through a separate software.  It is not clear if this process would allow a validation check prior to filing.

The second option would be for EQR filers to submit data through XML-formatted files, an approach currently utilized in eTariff filings.  In the NOPR, FERC notes the “various advantages” of this approach, specifically the ability to run validations checks that would allow EQR filers to “test the consistency of their data with the Commission’s filing standards, improving the ability to comply with the EQR filing requirement and increasing confidence that the Commission receives the intended information.”  This approach likely would involve third-party software in order to generate the XML files.

FERC has announced that it will lead a conference open to the public and available via webcast on July 11 in order to discuss the proposed changes.  Additional information related to the conference has not yet been provided by FERC, but details should be available at http://www.ferc.gov/ in the coming days. 

© 2013 Bracewell & Giuliani LLP

About the Author

Paralegal

Elisabeth Drabkin is a paralegal in the energy regulation and compliance group of Bracewell & Giuliani LLP’s Washington, D.C. office. Ms. Drabkin brings experience in natural gas transmission and distribution projects, including pipeline safety, gas quality, and climate matters.

Prior to joining the firm, she worked in the energy industry handling legislative, regulatory and fundraising issues. She has also spent time overseeing political fundraising and ethics compliance.

Ms. Drabkin formerly served as associate director of the D.C. Chapter of Young Professionals...

202.828.7629

About the Author

Partner

Sandy Rizzo is a partner in the firm's Energy Regulatory Group. Her clients primarily include electric utilities, power marketers, independent power producers, and investment and hedge funds owning securities of electric utility holding companies.  She assists clients in litigated proceedings before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and state and federal courts; advocates regarding the development of and changes to federal regulatory policies, regulations and rules applicable to the electric industry; and advises clients regarding regulatory compliance and...

202.828.5858

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.