Advertisement

July 22, 2014

Fifth Circuit Denies Review of EPA Title V Permit Objections

The Fifth Circuit denied review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of EPA objections to three Title V Permits issued by the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality ("LDEQ") to Nucor Steel Louisiana for an iron manufacturing facility. See Louisiana Dep’t Env’l Quality v. U.S. Env’l Protection Agency, Case No. 12-60482, Slip Op. Fifth Cir. Sept. 13, 2013. LDEQ brought suit challenging the objections, issued almost two years after the State had issued the permits. Rejecting arguments that EPA’s objections were not proper "objections" and were untimely made, the Court held that Clean Air Act Section 7661d(c) does not allow judicial review of an objection and is not final Agency action. In dicta, the Court pointed to other provisions of the Act (citizen suit provisions) as potential mechanisms for challenging an EPA objection.

© 2014 Beveridge & Diamond PC

About the Author

Madeleine Boyer Kadas, Environmental Lawyer, Beveridge & Diamond Law Firm
Principal

Maddie Kadas is a Principal in the Firm's Texas Office and divides her practice between international and domestic environmental law. She began as an Associate in the Washington D.C. Office in 1999 and was named the first Managing Principal of the Texas Office in 2005.    

512-391-8010

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we